Hand (New York, N.Y.) · 2024
The Psychological Impact of Adult Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injury.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Emani Sivaram, Garg Rohit, Elhassan Bassem, Winograd Jonathan, Zhang Dafang
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Adult traumatic brachial plexus injuries (BPIs) present a significant medical challenge, potentially leading to life-altering consequences for patients' upper extremity pain and function. However, the psychological impact on patients has not been extensively studied.
METHODS: Adult patients with traumatic BPIs treated at 2 tertiary referral centers in the United States from 2015 to 2019 were retrospectively identified. This cohort of 84 patients was targeted for prospective interviews, and 44 patients (52%) responded. Validated measures including the posttrumatic stress disorder (PTSD) Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: Fifth Edition (PCL-5), Decision Regret Scale, Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity, PROMIS Pain Interference, PROMIS Upper Extremity, and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) were obtained through telephone-based interviews. Additional data were collected through electronic medical record review.
RESULTS: On average, patients experience low post-traumatic stress (median score 6, interquartile range [IQR] 3-20) and decision regret (median score 5, IQR 0-22.5). However, a notable fraction (18%) of patients met the clinical threshold for PTSD. Significant correlations were observed between PCL-5 scores and worse PROMIS Pain Intensity, PROMIS Pain Interference, PROMIS Upper Extremity, and QuickDASH. Decision regret scores correlated with worse PROMIS Upper Extremity and QuickDASH.
CONCLUSIONS: While the overall incidence of PTSD and treatment decision regret after adult traumatic BPI is low, clinical PTSD was found in a significant percentage of patients associated with pain and functional impairment. This study highlights the importance of understanding and addressing the psychological burden of traumatic BPI.
METHODS: Adult patients with traumatic BPIs treated at 2 tertiary referral centers in the United States from 2015 to 2019 were retrospectively identified. This cohort of 84 patients was targeted for prospective interviews, and 44 patients (52%) responded. Validated measures including the posttrumatic stress disorder (PTSD) Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: Fifth Edition (PCL-5), Decision Regret Scale, Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity, PROMIS Pain Interference, PROMIS Upper Extremity, and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) were obtained through telephone-based interviews. Additional data were collected through electronic medical record review.
RESULTS: On average, patients experience low post-traumatic stress (median score 6, interquartile range [IQR] 3-20) and decision regret (median score 5, IQR 0-22.5). However, a notable fraction (18%) of patients met the clinical threshold for PTSD. Significant correlations were observed between PCL-5 scores and worse PROMIS Pain Intensity, PROMIS Pain Interference, PROMIS Upper Extremity, and QuickDASH. Decision regret scores correlated with worse PROMIS Upper Extremity and QuickDASH.
CONCLUSIONS: While the overall incidence of PTSD and treatment decision regret after adult traumatic BPI is low, clinical PTSD was found in a significant percentage of patients associated with pain and functional impairment. This study highlights the importance of understanding and addressing the psychological burden of traumatic BPI.