MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1038/s12276-026-01785-1

Медицинская библиотека · Experimental & molecular medicine · 2026

KiGEP: a quantitative algorithm for calculating human kidney similarity and nephrotoxicity in human kidney organoids.

Lee Sugi, Kang Hyun Mi, Lim Jung Hwa, Kim Dae Hun, Park Kunhyang, Oh Jung-Hwa, Son Mi-Young, Jung Cho-Rok, Kim Dae-Soo, Cho Hyun-Soo

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Kidney organoids (KOs) are being actively developed and used as models for evaluating nephrotoxicity, which is an important process during drug development. To evaluate human pluripotent stem cell-derived KOs, various lineage markers have been used to confirm KO differentiation via quantitative real-time-PCR and western blotting. However, as these are qualitative evaluations, there are currently limitations in evaluating how similar differentiated KOs are to actual human kidneys. Thus, in this study, we utilized RNA-sequencing (21 organs; n = 7361) derived from the GTEx database to create a transcriptome-based kidney-specific gene expression panel (KiGEP) and developed a quantitative calculation algorithm (the KiGEP algorithm) to assess the similarity between human pluripotent stem cell-derived KOs and human kidneys. Thus, the KiGEP algorithm allows quantitative quality assessments of KOs, providing important information for the development of high-quality KOs for drug development and regenerative medicine applications.

Для цитирования: Lee Sugi, Kang Hyun Mi, Lim Jung Hwa, Kim Dae Hun, Park Kunhyang, Oh Jung-Hwa, Son Mi-Young, Jung Cho-Rok, Kim Dae-Soo, Cho Hyun-Soo. KiGEP: a quantitative algorithm for calculating human kidney similarity and nephrotoxicity in human kidney organoids.. Experimental & molecular medicine. 2026. DOI: 10.1038/s12276-026-01785-1.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.