DOI 10.1016/j.asjsur.2020.01.005
Applicability of the Sarculator and MSKCC nomograms to retroperitoneal sarcoma prognostication in an Asian tertiary center.
Аннотация
AIM: To study the applicability of 2 common nomograms in retroperitoneal sarcoma patients treated in an Asian tertiary hospital, and to study relapse patterns.
METHODS
Patients from 1st January 2000 to 31st December 2017 were retrospectively analysed. R2 resection from an external institution were ineligible. Harrel's C concordance index and calibration plots were used to assess nomograms' accuracy.
RESULTS
109 patients were eligible, with a median age of 56, median tumour size of 16 cm and median follow up of 44.1 months. Most common subtypes were DDLPS (46.8%), LMS (19.3%) and WDLPS (13.8%). Overall, 81.1% had passed away from sarcoma. Recurrence patterns differed with subtypes; 6.7% of WDLPS and 66.7% of LMS had distant relapses. WDLPS patients had a median sarcoma specific survival of 139 months (122-NA), while the rest had a median SSS of 72.3 months (59.7-NA). The 5-years and 7-year OS were 63.0% (95% CI: 53.6%-74.0%) and 51.6% (41.1%-64.8%) respectively. The 5-years and 7-year DFS were 22.4% (15.5%-32.3%) and 17.5% (11%-27.8%) respectively. The 4-years, 8-years and 12-year SSS were 71.3% (62.7%-81.0%), 51.8% (40.8%-65.8%) and 32.2% (19.7%-52.6%) respectively. The concordance indices for 7-year DFS and OS (Sarculator) were 0.63 and 0.73. The concordance indices for 4-, 8- and 12-year SSS (MSKCC) were 0.64, 0.72 and 0.72.
CONCLUSION
Both nomograms were effective in our cohort. Both nomograms can be further improved by specifying the type of relapse and including a longer-term endpoint for the Sarculator.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.