DOI 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092778
Physical activity and risk of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of observational studies.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Studies evaluating the relationship of physical activity and stomach cancer risk have yielded inconsistent and largely inconclusive results. We therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies that assessed the relationship between physical activity and risk of gastric cancer.
METHODS
Following a standard protocol, we searched medical literature databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Google Scholar) from inception to July 2012, and conducted a random effects meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Seven prospective cohorts and four case-control studies of physical activity and gastric cancer risk, with 1,535,006 people and 7944 cases of gastric cancer were included. We found a modest protective association between sufficient physical activity and gastric cancer risk (relative risk: 0.81 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.96); I(2)=68.5%) in the prospective studies and (relative risk: 0.78 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.91); I(2)=0%) in case-control studies. The association appeared weaker in smokers than in non-smokers (p heterogeneity=0.035). The association may also be weaker for gastric cardia cancer relative to the distal non-cardia subtypes. Physical activity type (recreational or occupational), intake of alcohol, total energy intake, consumption of fruits and vegetables and infection with Helicobacter pylori had no influence on the association. The effect measure from cohort studies (relative risk: 0.82 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.97); I(2)=61.7%) and case-control studies (relative risk: 0.83 (95% CI 0.66 to 1.04); I(2)=49.8%) did not differ materially at higher physical activity levels.
CONCLUSIONS
We conclude that a regular physical activity may be protective against stomach cancer risk.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.