MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.11.007

Медицинская библиотека · Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics · 2008

Sonographic diagnosis of Sjögren syndrome: evaluation of parotid gland vascularity as a diagnostic tool.

Shimizu Mayumi, Okamura Kazutoshi, Yoshiura Kazunori, Ohyama Yukiko, Nakamura Seiji

Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the usefulness of the vascularity in parotid glands in sonographic diagnosis for Sjögren syndrome.

STUDY

DESIGN

Sonographic images of 72 cases of previously suspected Sjögren syndrome (including 43 actual cases) were analyzed retrospectively for the abnormal vascularity in the parotid gland parenchyma. The relationships between the vascularity and the results of sialographic, serologic, and histopathologic examinations were analyzed. We also compared the diagnostic accuracy of B-mode only with that of B-mode plus Doppler-mode.

RESULTS

Sjögren-positive cases showed significantly higher vascularity. As the grade of vascularity became higher, the rate of the Sjögren-negative cases became lower. The highest mean vascular score could be observed both in the initial stage and in the cavitary-destructive stage in the sialographic grades. Sensitivity and accuracy were markedly improved with vascular information.

CONCLUSION

By using vascular information, sonographic diagnosis for Sjögren syndrome can be improved.

Для цитирования: Shimizu Mayumi, Okamura Kazutoshi, Yoshiura Kazunori, Ohyama Yukiko, Nakamura Seiji. Sonographic diagnosis of Sjögren syndrome: evaluation of parotid gland vascularity as a diagnostic tool.. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.11.007.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.