MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jocn.2004.04.009

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia · 2005

Blind transpyloric nasojejunal versus nasogastric tube intubation in severe head injuries: a preliminary report.

Marino L V, Ramchandra Praneel, Nathoo Narendra

Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

AIM: To compare the efficacy of blind transpyloric placement using a specifically designed nasojejunal tube (NJT) versus a standard nasogastric tube (NGT) in severe head injury (SHI).

METHODS

This was a randomised trial conducted in a neurosurgical intensive care unit. Fourteen patients were enrolled with a Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) less than 8 (mean 6.8 SEM+/-0.36). Patients were randomised to receive either NJT or NGT.

RESULTS

There was an 83% (5/6 patients) spontaneous jejunal placement rate of NJT past the ligament of Treitz. The 17% (1/6 patients) jejunal placement failure rate for NJT was due to inappropriate technique. A 100% (8/8 patients) failure of the unweighted NGTs to pass through the pylorus into the jejunum was recorded (P=0.002).

CONCLUSION

In SHI, the specifically designed self-propelling NJT was effective in spontaneous transpyloric placement past the ligament of Treitz within 12h of introduction into the gastric cavity. The standard un-weighted NGT was ineffective. Additional studies are warranted to determine the clinical efficacy of this self-propelling NJT.

Для цитирования: Marino L V, Ramchandra Praneel, Nathoo Narendra. Blind transpyloric nasojejunal versus nasogastric tube intubation in severe head injuries: a preliminary report.. Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia. 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2004.04.009.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.