MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Revista de gastroenterologia de Mexico · 1996

[Precut sphincterotomy in impacted choledocholithiasis at the Vater's ampulla].

Güitrón A, Adalid R, Nares J, Albores Manzo A

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic sphincterotomy is an established treatment for common bile duct stones. Stone impaction at the ampulla makes deep cannulation and standard sphincterotomy more difficult. The use of precut papillotomy may facilitate stone extraction, although risks may be greater.

AIM: To evaluate precut papillotomy in impacted common bile duct stone at the ampulla of Vater.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

Between October 1990 and September 1995, 27 of 345 patients with common bile duct stones underwent needle knife precut papillotomy after conventional sphincterotomy failed due to impacted ampullary stone. This facilitated deep cannulation and subsequent standard sphincterotomy in 12 patients.

RESULTS

Eleven patients had spontaneous expulsion of the stone when precut papillotomy was extended. Oedema or bleeding precluded stone extraction in 3 patients, and these stones were removed at a second endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) session. Mild bleeding occurred in one patient and hemotransfusion was necessary. There was no perforation or pancreatitis following the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Precut papillotomy is effective in the treatment of impacted common bile duct stone at the ampulla of Vater. It's a technique that should be performed only by an experienced endoscopist and does not increase the complications risk.

Для цитирования: Güitrón A, Adalid R, Nares J, Albores Manzo A. [Precut sphincterotomy in impacted choledocholithiasis at the Vater's ampulla].. Revista de gastroenterologia de Mexico. 1996.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.