Surgical endoscopy · 2015
An analysis of risk factors for pancreatic fistula after robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: outcomes from a consecutive series of standardized pancreatic reconstructions.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Polanco Patricio M, Zenati Mazen S, Hogg Melissa E, Shakir Murtaza, Boone Brian A, Bartlett David L, Zeh Herbert J, Zureikat Amer H
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Proponents of the robotic platform site its potential advantages in complex reconstructions such as the pancreaticojejunal anastomosis; however, the incidence and risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) have not been characterized.
OBJECTIVE: To identify independent risk factors for POPF after RPD.
METHODS: A prospectively maintained database of patients that underwent RPD (2008-2013) with a standardized pancreaticojejunostomy was analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses (UVA/MVA) were used to identify independent predictors for POPF. The POPF prognostic scores developed by Braga and Callery for open pancreaticoduodenectomy were then applied with logistic regression analysis on this RPD cohort.
RESULTS: One hundred and fifty consecutive RPDs were analyzed. POPF occurred in 26 (17.3%); 13 (8.6%) of which were ISGPF category B and C. On UVA, patients with POPF had larger body mass index (BMI), smaller pancreatic duct diameter, smaller tumor size, longer OR time, larger estimated blood loss (EBL) and RBC transfusion (all p < 0.05). Higher EBL, duct size <4 mm, larger BMI and small tumor size remained the best independent risk factors for POPF on MVA. Increased Callery (OR 1.46, 95% CI, p = 0.001) and Braga (OR 1.2, 95% CI, p = 0.005) scores predicted an increased risk of POPF in this RPD cohort.
CONCLUSIONS: Larger BMI, higher EBL, smaller tumor size and smaller duct diameter are the main predictors of POPF in RPD.
OBJECTIVE: To identify independent risk factors for POPF after RPD.
METHODS: A prospectively maintained database of patients that underwent RPD (2008-2013) with a standardized pancreaticojejunostomy was analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses (UVA/MVA) were used to identify independent predictors for POPF. The POPF prognostic scores developed by Braga and Callery for open pancreaticoduodenectomy were then applied with logistic regression analysis on this RPD cohort.
RESULTS: One hundred and fifty consecutive RPDs were analyzed. POPF occurred in 26 (17.3%); 13 (8.6%) of which were ISGPF category B and C. On UVA, patients with POPF had larger body mass index (BMI), smaller pancreatic duct diameter, smaller tumor size, longer OR time, larger estimated blood loss (EBL) and RBC transfusion (all p < 0.05). Higher EBL, duct size <4 mm, larger BMI and small tumor size remained the best independent risk factors for POPF on MVA. Increased Callery (OR 1.46, 95% CI, p = 0.001) and Braga (OR 1.2, 95% CI, p = 0.005) scores predicted an increased risk of POPF in this RPD cohort.
CONCLUSIONS: Larger BMI, higher EBL, smaller tumor size and smaller duct diameter are the main predictors of POPF in RPD.