MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/hed.20852

Медицинская библиотека · Head & neck · 2008

Clinical outcome of T1 glottic carcinoma since the introduction of endoscopic CO2 laser surgery as treatment option.

Sjögren Elisabeth V, Langeveld Ton P M, Baatenburg de Jong Robert J

Сравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Since the introduction of endoscopic laser surgery at our institution in 1996, 189 patients have been treated for T1 glottic carcinoma.

METHODS

Treatment allocation (radiotherapy vs laser surgery) and outcome were evaluated.

RESULTS

Fifty-one percent of T1a lesions were considered suitable for laser surgery. Sixteen percent of T1a patients treated with laser surgery needed additional treatment because of positive resection margins. Overall local control and larynx preservation were 89% and 96%. Both were poorer in T1a patients with larger lesions treated with radiotherapy (local control 75% versus 89%, p = .05, larynx preservation 83% vs 100%, p = .001).

CONCLUSION

Outcome for T1a patients selected for laser surgery is excellent. In patients with larger lesions treated with radiotherapy, outcome is inferior to patients selected for laser surgery, but also to that reported for (unselected) T1a carcinomas treated with radiotherapy in literature. Strategies to improve treatment results in patients deemed unsuitable for laser surgery should be designed.

Для цитирования: Sjögren Elisabeth V, Langeveld Ton P M, Baatenburg de Jong Robert J. Clinical outcome of T1 glottic carcinoma since the introduction of endoscopic CO2 laser surgery as treatment option.. Head & neck. 2008. DOI: 10.1002/hed.20852.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.