Paediatric anaesthesia · 2007
Randomized controlled trial of sevoflurane for intubation in neonates.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hassid Sophie, Nicaise Claire, Michel Fabrice, Vialet Renaud, Thomachot Laurent, Lagier Pierre, Martin Claude
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Our aim was to determine whether sevoflurane can be used with safety and efficacy for anesthesia during intubation in term and preterm neonates in a prospective randomized-controlled nonblinded study in a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit.
METHODS: Thirty-three neonates were randomly allocated to receive sevoflurane (inspired concentrations varying from 2% to 5%) or no medication (preoxygenation with 100% oxygen alone) before intubation. Minute by minute heart rate (HR), mean arterial blood pressure, SpO(2) and number of episodes of bradycardia (HR < 100 b.min(-1)) and desaturation (SpO(2) < 85% for >30 s) were noted from 5 min before to 10 min after intubation. Operator experience, ease and number of attempts were noted.
RESULTS: No major adverse events were noted in the study group compared with the control group [hypotension (37.5% vs 37.5%, NS), number of desaturations [37.5% vs 44.5%, NS)]. Hypertension (25%, vs 56.3%P = 0.04) and incidence of bradycardias (8.3% vs 44.4%, P < 0.01) were greater in the control group. Intubation was easier in the study group: no movements: 95.5% vs 28% (P < 0.005); good glottis visualization: 73% vs 33% (P = 0.013). The failure rate was lower in the study group (25% vs 39%), but this difference was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: Anesthesia for intubation with sevoflurane in neonates is well tolerated, even in the less mature. It facilitates the conditions for intubation and leads to fewer adverse events. Other studies are necessary to confirm these preliminary results.
METHODS: Thirty-three neonates were randomly allocated to receive sevoflurane (inspired concentrations varying from 2% to 5%) or no medication (preoxygenation with 100% oxygen alone) before intubation. Minute by minute heart rate (HR), mean arterial blood pressure, SpO(2) and number of episodes of bradycardia (HR < 100 b.min(-1)) and desaturation (SpO(2) < 85% for >30 s) were noted from 5 min before to 10 min after intubation. Operator experience, ease and number of attempts were noted.
RESULTS: No major adverse events were noted in the study group compared with the control group [hypotension (37.5% vs 37.5%, NS), number of desaturations [37.5% vs 44.5%, NS)]. Hypertension (25%, vs 56.3%P = 0.04) and incidence of bradycardias (8.3% vs 44.4%, P < 0.01) were greater in the control group. Intubation was easier in the study group: no movements: 95.5% vs 28% (P < 0.005); good glottis visualization: 73% vs 33% (P = 0.013). The failure rate was lower in the study group (25% vs 39%), but this difference was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: Anesthesia for intubation with sevoflurane in neonates is well tolerated, even in the less mature. It facilitates the conditions for intubation and leads to fewer adverse events. Other studies are necessary to confirm these preliminary results.