MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology · 2007

[GlideScope videolaryngoscope: a clinical assessment of its performance in 200 consecutive patients].

Hirabayashi Yoshihiro, Hakozaki Takahiro, Fujisawa Kohji, Yamada Masaki, Suzuki Hideo, Satoh Masaaki, Hotta Kunihisa, Igarashi Takashi, Taga Naoyuki, Seo Norimasa

Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The GlideScope videolaryngoscope is a new device for endotracheal intubation, which provides a view of the glottis without alignment of the oral pharyngeal and tracheal axes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of the GlideScope in patients.

METHODS

We evaluated the performance of the GlideScope" in 200 consecutive patients requiring orotracheal intubation for surgery.

RESULTS

In the 200 patients, excellent (Cormack-Lehane [C-L] view 1) or good (C-L 2) laryngeal exposure was obtained in 68% and 31% respectively and successful orotracheal intubation was achieved in all the patients. The mean +/- SD time to intubate was 51 +/- 20 seconds in trainees, 52 +/- 25 seconds in junior anesthesia residents, 48 +/- 18 seconds in senior anesthesia residents, and 50 +/- 18 seconds in staff anesthetists.

CONCLUSIONS

The GlideScope was easily handled not only by experienced anesthetists but also by novice personnel. The GlideScope seems to be a novel device in routine and difficult airway management.

Для цитирования: Hirabayashi Yoshihiro, Hakozaki Takahiro, Fujisawa Kohji, Yamada Masaki, Suzuki Hideo, Satoh Masaaki, Hotta Kunihisa, Igarashi Takashi, Taga Naoyuki, Seo Norimasa. [GlideScope videolaryngoscope: a clinical assessment of its performance in 200 consecutive patients].. Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology. 2007.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.