MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/id.0000000000000485

Медицинская библиотека · Implant dentistry · 2016

Characterization of the Maxillary Sinus Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. A Retrospective Radiographic Study.

Sánchez-Pérez Arturo, Boracchia Alexandra Carla, López-Jornet Pía, Boix-García Paula

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To analyze the anatomical findings and alterations of the maxillary sinus in asymptomatic patients observed by cone beam computed tomography.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

A cross-sectional retrospective study of the anatomical variations and alterations of the maxillary sinus was made in 160 patients-71 males (44.3%) and 89 females (55.6%), with an age range of 18 to 74 years-measuring the thickness of the Schneiderian membrane and the cortical thickness of the lower margin of the maxillary sinus (in its most caudal portion), and correlations among the different study variables were assessed.

RESULTS

Sinus pneumatization was the most frequent anatomical finding (81.3%). A negative correlation was observed between the thickness of the Schneiderian membrane and the presence of Underwood septa (P < 0.005). Mucosal thickening of more than 2 mm was directly correlated with the presence of maxillary sinus lesions (opacification, discontinuity of the floor of the sinus, polypoid lesions, or air-liquid levels).

CONCLUSION

The presence or absence of septa seems to be related to the thickness of the Schneiderian membrane.

Для цитирования: Sánchez-Pérez Arturo, Boracchia Alexandra Carla, López-Jornet Pía, Boix-García Paula. Characterization of the Maxillary Sinus Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. A Retrospective Radiographic Study.. Implant dentistry. 2016. DOI: 10.1097/id.0000000000000485.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.