MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1001/archotol.133.3.266

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery · 2007

Assessment of recurrent laryngeal nerve during thyroid surgery with laryngeal mask airway.

Pott Leonard, Swick John T, Stack Brendan C

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To study the feasibility of using laryngeal mask anesthesia (LMA) with bronchoscopic evaluation of recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) integrity when stimulated.

DESIGN

Single-institution prospective case series.

SETTING

A single, mid-Atlantic region academic medical center.

PATIENTS: Twenty-seven adult volunteers.

INTERVENTIONS: Laryngeal mask anesthesia for thyroid surgery, monitored by flexible laryngoscopy and nerve integrity testing.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Success rates for LMA use in thyroid surgery, bronchoscopic visualization of laryngeal glottis, and documentation of RLN integrity following surgery.

RESULTS

We report our experience on 27 consecutive cases in which LMA with RLN stimulation was used for thyroid surgery. Twenty-five of 27 patients underwent successful LMA and visual documentation of RLN integrity by bronchoscopic inspection of nerve stimulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct visualization of vocal cords using a fiberoptic bronchoscope via an LMA provides a safe and feasible method of laryngeal assessment following thyroid dissection. Continuous real-time video monitoring may be the next step in development of this technique as a patient safety measure for thyroid and parathyroid surgery.

Для цитирования: Pott Leonard, Swick John T, Stack Brendan C. Assessment of recurrent laryngeal nerve during thyroid surgery with laryngeal mask airway.. Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery. 2007. DOI: 10.1001/archotol.133.3.266.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.