MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/hed.20500

Медицинская библиотека · Head & neck · 2007

Cordectomy by CO2 laser or radiotherapy for small T1a glottic carcinomas: costs, local control, survival, quality of life, and voice quality.

Goor Kim M, Peeters A Jeanne G E, Mahieu Hans F, Langendijk Johannes A, Leemans C René, Verdonck-de Leeuw Irma M, van Agthoven Michel

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The clinical results of radiotherapy and endoscopic cordectomy for T1a glottic carcinoma are reported to be similar, but costs of both treatments may differ. Therefore, we retrospectively evaluated the costs, voice quality, quality of life, and clinical results of both treatments.

METHODS

Costs and effects from the first visit up to 2 years of follow-up were calculated, based on chart data of 35 and 54 patients who were treated with curative intent for T1a glottic carcinoma from 1995 to 1999 with radiotherapy and endoscopic cordectomy, respectively. Voice quality and quality of life were evaluated by means of patient questionnaires.

RESULTS

Total costs (in Euros) of radiotherapy and CO(2)-laser cordectomy were 8322 euro and 4434 euro, respectively, including the costs of treating possible recurrences. The effects of both treatments were equal, including voice quality and quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that endoscopic cordectomy is an efficient alternative for radiotherapy for these patients.

Для цитирования: Goor Kim M, Peeters A Jeanne G E, Mahieu Hans F, Langendijk Johannes A, Leemans C René, Verdonck-de Leeuw Irma M, van Agthoven Michel. Cordectomy by CO2 laser or radiotherapy for small T1a glottic carcinomas: costs, local control, survival, quality of life, and voice quality.. Head & neck. 2007. DOI: 10.1002/hed.20500.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.