MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.04.007

Медицинская библиотека · Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2006

The influence of epilarynx area on vocal fold dynamics.

Döllinger Michael, Berry David A, Montequin Douglas W

СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the influence of epilarynx area on an excised human vocal fold during phonation.

STUDY

DESIGN

A hemilarynx set-up using an excised human larynx was used. An artificial vocal tract with an epilarynx tube of variable cross-sectional area was attached. High-speed imaging was performed and standard phonatory variables were measured.

RESULTS

Glottal airflow, fundamental frequency, and sound level increased as a function of subglottal pressure. A decrease in epilarynx area decreased phonation threshold pressure, glottal airflow, and vocal fold displacements and velocities.

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary experimental results confirm that narrowing the epilarynx area facilitates phonation by decreasing phonation threshold pressure, presumably through impedance matching of the glottal source and vocal tract.

SIGNIFICANCE: As this phenomenon associated with epilarynx narrowing is further quantified and generalized, eventually new surgical alterations of the epilaryngeal structure may be suggested to facilitate phonation, in addition to standard phonosurgical procedures.

Для цитирования: Döllinger Michael, Berry David A, Montequin Douglas W. The influence of epilarynx area on vocal fold dynamics.. Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.04.007.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.