Journal of oral & facial pain and headache · 2016
Is the Nociceptive Blink Reflex Associated with Psychological Factors in Healthy Participants?
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Costa Yuri Martins, Baad-Hansen Lene, Bonjardim Leonardo Rigoldi, Rodrigues Conti Paulo César, Svensson Peter
Аннотация
AIMS: To evaluate the possible association between the nociceptive blink reflex (nBR) and various pain-related psychological measures: the Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3 (ASI-3), the Fear of Pain Questionnaire III (FPQ-III), the Pain Vigilance and Awareness Questionnaire (PVAQ), the Somatosensory Amplification Scale (SSAS), the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and the Situational Pain Catastrophizing Scale (S-PCS).
METHODS: The nBR was evaluated in 21 healthy participants. It was elicited by a nociceptive-specific electrode placed over the entry zone of the right supraorbital nerve, infraorbital nerve, and mental nerve, as well as the left infraorbital nerve. The outcomes were (1) nBR measurements: (a) individual electrical sensory threshold (I0) and pain threshold (IP); (b) root mean square (RMS), area under the curve (AUC), and onset latencies of R2 responses; (c) stimulus-evoked pain on a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale (NRS); and (2) the ASI-3, the FPQ-III, the PVAQ, the SSAS, the PCS, and the S-PCS. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the association between the means of nBR measurements from all sites and the questionnaires The significance level was set up after a Bonferroni correction (adjusted α = .8%).
RESULTS: There was no correlation for any pair of variables at the adjusted significance level (P > .008). There was only a single significant correlation at the standard significance level (P < .05), where the pain intensity (NRS) at 50% of IP presented a positive and small to moderate correlation with the PCS (r = 0.43, P = .04).
CONCLUSION: It appears that the nBR and its associated psychophysical measures are not associated with psychological factors in healthy participants.
METHODS: The nBR was evaluated in 21 healthy participants. It was elicited by a nociceptive-specific electrode placed over the entry zone of the right supraorbital nerve, infraorbital nerve, and mental nerve, as well as the left infraorbital nerve. The outcomes were (1) nBR measurements: (a) individual electrical sensory threshold (I0) and pain threshold (IP); (b) root mean square (RMS), area under the curve (AUC), and onset latencies of R2 responses; (c) stimulus-evoked pain on a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale (NRS); and (2) the ASI-3, the FPQ-III, the PVAQ, the SSAS, the PCS, and the S-PCS. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the association between the means of nBR measurements from all sites and the questionnaires The significance level was set up after a Bonferroni correction (adjusted α = .8%).
RESULTS: There was no correlation for any pair of variables at the adjusted significance level (P > .008). There was only a single significant correlation at the standard significance level (P < .05), where the pain intensity (NRS) at 50% of IP presented a positive and small to moderate correlation with the PCS (r = 0.43, P = .04).
CONCLUSION: It appears that the nBR and its associated psychophysical measures are not associated with psychological factors in healthy participants.