The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2012
Retreatment with nedaplatin in patients with recurrent gynecological cancer after the development of hypersensitivity reaction to carboplatin.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Arimoto Takahide, Oda Katsutoshi, Nakagawa Shunsuke, Kawana Kei, Tsukazaki Takehiro, Adachi Katsuyuki, Matsumoto Yoko, Yano Tetsu, Kozuma Shiro, Taketani Yuji
Аннотация
AIM: Platinum is a milestone drug against gynecologic malignancies. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the feasibility of replacing carboplatin with nedaplatin in patients who had developed a hypersensitivity reaction to carboplatin.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifteen patients with recurrent gynecologic cancer (12 ovarian, 1 fallopian tube, 1 endometrial and 1 cervical cancer) who had experienced a hypersensitivity reaction to carboplatin and a possible clinical indication for continuing treatment with platinum were treated with nedaplatin (80 mg/m(2) )-containing regimen.
RESULTS: The total number of nedaplatin cycles given was 137 (range 1-29). Four (27%) patients developed hypersensitivity reactions on the second, second, fourth, and ninth administration, respectively. The severities of all the hypersensitivity reactions were grade 3 or less. The other 11 patients (73%) had no nedaplatin-associated hypersensitivity reactions. The incidence of hypersensitivity reactions in the paclitaxel and nedaplatin group (three of four, 75%) was more frequent than the docetaxel and nedaplatin group (none of seven, P=0.024). The objective response rate in eleven patients with measurable disease was 36% (complete response at 9% and partial response at 27%), and the disease control rate was 73% (stable disease at 36%).
CONCLUSION: Nedaplatin-associated hypersensitivity reactions are not rare in patients who developed allergic reactions to carboplatin. Retreatment of carboplatin-allergic patients with nedaplatin cannot be recommended without careful consideration of the potential risks and benefits.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifteen patients with recurrent gynecologic cancer (12 ovarian, 1 fallopian tube, 1 endometrial and 1 cervical cancer) who had experienced a hypersensitivity reaction to carboplatin and a possible clinical indication for continuing treatment with platinum were treated with nedaplatin (80 mg/m(2) )-containing regimen.
RESULTS: The total number of nedaplatin cycles given was 137 (range 1-29). Four (27%) patients developed hypersensitivity reactions on the second, second, fourth, and ninth administration, respectively. The severities of all the hypersensitivity reactions were grade 3 or less. The other 11 patients (73%) had no nedaplatin-associated hypersensitivity reactions. The incidence of hypersensitivity reactions in the paclitaxel and nedaplatin group (three of four, 75%) was more frequent than the docetaxel and nedaplatin group (none of seven, P=0.024). The objective response rate in eleven patients with measurable disease was 36% (complete response at 9% and partial response at 27%), and the disease control rate was 73% (stable disease at 36%).
CONCLUSION: Nedaplatin-associated hypersensitivity reactions are not rare in patients who developed allergic reactions to carboplatin. Retreatment of carboplatin-allergic patients with nedaplatin cannot be recommended without careful consideration of the potential risks and benefits.