Gynecologic oncology · 2003
Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy using the argon-beam coagulator: pilot data and comparison to laparotomy.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Abu-Rustum Nadeem R, Gemignani Mary L, Moore Kathleen, Sonoda Yukio, Venkatraman Ennapadam, Brown Carol, Poynor Elizabeth, Chi Dennis S, Barakat Richard R
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe the feasibility and outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for stage I cervical cancer using the argon-beam coagulator.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients with FIGO stage IA1-IB1 cervical cancer who underwent a total laparoscopic approach for definitive surgical treatment. Comparison was made to a cohort of 195 patients who were treated with laparotomy.
RESULTS: Between 12/2000 and 12/2002, 19 patients were offered the laparoscopic approach. The procedure was completed laparoscopically in 17 patients (89.5%). Two patients, in the beginning of the study, underwent conversion to laparotomy, 1 due to parametrial bleeding and 1 due to pelvic adhesions and cystotomy. Mean age was 42.6 years (range, 30-69 years); mean body mass index was 23.1 (range, 18-30); FIGO stage included IA1 with LVI (2), IA2 (6), IB1 (11). Mean pelvic lymph node count was 25.5 (range, 15-39), and 1 patient (5.3%) had positive nodes. Mean estimated blood loss was 301 cc (range, 75-1500 cc) compared to 693 cc in the laparotomy group (P < 0.01), mean operating time was 371 min (range, 230-600 min) compared to 295 min in the laparotomy group (P < 0.01), and mean hospital stay was 4.5 days (range, 3-11 days) compared to 9.7 days in the laparotomy group (P < 0.01). There were no ureteral injuries or fistula formation. All patients remain clinically disease free at the time of this report.
CONCLUSIONS: Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for selected patients with stage I cervical cancer is feasible, safe, and associated with a low morbidity in the pilot phase. Estimated blood loss and postoperative hospitalization appear shorter than historical controls, at the cost of longer operating time. Oncologic outcome requires longer follow-up.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients with FIGO stage IA1-IB1 cervical cancer who underwent a total laparoscopic approach for definitive surgical treatment. Comparison was made to a cohort of 195 patients who were treated with laparotomy.
RESULTS: Between 12/2000 and 12/2002, 19 patients were offered the laparoscopic approach. The procedure was completed laparoscopically in 17 patients (89.5%). Two patients, in the beginning of the study, underwent conversion to laparotomy, 1 due to parametrial bleeding and 1 due to pelvic adhesions and cystotomy. Mean age was 42.6 years (range, 30-69 years); mean body mass index was 23.1 (range, 18-30); FIGO stage included IA1 with LVI (2), IA2 (6), IB1 (11). Mean pelvic lymph node count was 25.5 (range, 15-39), and 1 patient (5.3%) had positive nodes. Mean estimated blood loss was 301 cc (range, 75-1500 cc) compared to 693 cc in the laparotomy group (P < 0.01), mean operating time was 371 min (range, 230-600 min) compared to 295 min in the laparotomy group (P < 0.01), and mean hospital stay was 4.5 days (range, 3-11 days) compared to 9.7 days in the laparotomy group (P < 0.01). There were no ureteral injuries or fistula formation. All patients remain clinically disease free at the time of this report.
CONCLUSIONS: Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for selected patients with stage I cervical cancer is feasible, safe, and associated with a low morbidity in the pilot phase. Estimated blood loss and postoperative hospitalization appear shorter than historical controls, at the cost of longer operating time. Oncologic outcome requires longer follow-up.