MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/02643294.2022.2041589

Медицинская библиотека · Cognitive neuropsychology · 2021

Can a fast thinker be a good thinker? The neural correlates of base-rate neglect measured using a two-response paradigm.

Vartanian Oshin, Lam Timothy K, Maceda Elaine, De Neys Wim

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Traditionally, it has been assumed that logical thinking requires deliberation. However, people can also make logical responses quickly, exhibiting logical intuitions. We examined the neural correlates of logical intuitions by administering base rate problems during fMRI scanning using a two-response paradigm where participants first responded quickly and then reflectively to problems that did or did not pit a normative response against an intuitively-cued stereotypical response (i.e., conflict vs. non-conflict problems). As predicted, participants were less likely to make judgments in accordance with base rates on conflict problems. Critically, in only 4% of cases did longer deliberation change an initially biased response to a normatively correct response. The fMRI data revealed that intuitively-made initial biased judgments nevertheless activate regions typically involved in cognitive control, executive functions and attention, including anterior, inferior, middle and superior frontal cortex, suggesting that even when errors are made, there might be very early awareness of conflict.

Для цитирования: Vartanian Oshin, Lam Timothy K, Maceda Elaine, De Neys Wim. Can a fast thinker be a good thinker? The neural correlates of base-rate neglect measured using a two-response paradigm.. Cognitive neuropsychology. 2021. DOI: 10.1080/02643294.2022.2041589.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.