MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/17482631.2020.1756686

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2020

Consulting with a folk deity before making decisions: spiritual practices in parents facing end-of-life decisions for their child on life support with brain stem dysfunction.

Lin Shih-Chun, Huang Mei-Chih

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Background

Adolescents with brain stem dysfunction may undergo many invasive treatments, and parents are often faced with making the decision to withdraw treatment. However, in the face of their child's death, the spiritual practices of parents dealing with end-of-life decision-making remain under investigated.Purpose: This study explores the spiritual practices in parents making end-of-life decisions for adolescents on life support with brain stem dysfunction.Method: A descriptive phenomenological study was conducted through in-depth interviews with three parents of two adolescents in Taiwan. Data were analysed using Colaizzi's seven-step protocol.

Results

Three main themes emerged: (1) faith during decision-making, (2) struggles during decision-making, (3) transformation during decision-making. The findings indicate that "transforming the nature of hope" is the essence of the experience.

Conclusion

Family-centred care, gaining insight into parental spiritual practices, and developing culturally-appropriate care are recommended.

Для цитирования: Lin Shih-Chun, Huang Mei-Chih. Consulting with a folk deity before making decisions: spiritual practices in parents facing end-of-life decisions for their child on life support with brain stem dysfunction.. International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being. 2020. DOI: 10.1080/17482631.2020.1756686.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.