Hypoglossal Nerve Transfer for Facial Nerve Paralysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background

Hypoglossal-facial nerve (12-7) anastomosis can restore symmetry and voluntary movement on the face in patients with facial nerve paralysis. Traditional 12-7 transfer includes direct end-to-end nerve anastomosis, sacrificing the entire hypoglossal nerve. Contemporary, end-to-side anastomosis, or split anastomosis techniques limit tongue morbidity by preserving some hypoglossal nerve. Direct outcome comparisons between these techniques are limited.

Objective

To compare reported outcomes of facial movement, tongue, speech, and swallow outcomes among the different types of hypoglossal-facial nerve anastomosis schemes. Evidence Review: For this systematic review and meta-analysis, a comprehensive strategy was designed to search PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Database from inception to January 2021, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis, reporting guideline yielding 383 results. Any participant who underwent 12-7 transfer using any of the three techniques, with or without an interposition graft, and had documented preoperative and postoperative evaluation of facial nerve function with a validated instrument such as House-Brackmann (HB), was considered for inclusion. Secondary outcomes of synkinesis, tongue atrophy, and speech or swallowing dysfunction were also compared. Forty-nine studies met inclusion criteria, representing data from 961 total patients who underwent 12-7 transfer.

Results

The proportion of good HB outcomes (HB I-III) did not differ by anastomosis type: End-to-side and end-to-end anastomosis (73% vs. 59%, p = 0.07), split and end-to-end anastomosis (62% vs. 59%, p = 0.88), and end-to-side anastomosis and split anastomosis (73% vs. 62%, p = 0.46). There was no difference in reported synkinesis rates between the anastomosis types. However, end-to-side anastomosis (z = 6.55, p < 0.01) and split anastomosis (z = 3.58, p < 0.01) developed less tongue atrophy than end-to-end anastomosis. End-to-side anastomosis had less speech/swallowing dysfunction than end-to-end anastomosis (z = 3.21, p < 0.01).

Conclusion

End-to-side and split anastomoses result in similar HB facial nerve outcomes as the traditional end-to-end 12-7 anastomosis. End-to-side anastomosis has decreased complications of tongue atrophy and speech/swallow dysfunction compared to end-to-end anastomosis. In addition, split anastomosis has decreased rates of tongue atrophy compared to end-to-end anastomosis.