Relationship Between Hip and Groin Pain and Hip Range of Motion in Amateur Soccer and Australian Rules Football Players.

BACKGROUND

The relationship between hip/groin pain and hip range of motion (ROM) is unclear.

PURPOSE: To explore the relationship between hip/groin pain and hip joint ROM and examine the influence of sex and cam morphology on this relationship.

STUDY

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Included were 184 amateur soccer and Australian Rules football players (276 hips; 20% women; median age, 26 years; interquartile range, 24-30 years) with hip/groin pain >6 months and a positive flexion-adduction-internal-rotation (FADIR) test, and 50 matched asymptomatic control players (98 hips; 28% women, median age, 26 years; interquartile range, 23-31 years). Hip ROM measures were flexion, internal and external rotation at 90° of hip flexion, total rotation (internal and external), and bent-knee fall out (BKFO). Cam morphology was determined from anteroposterior pelvis or 45° Dunn radiographs, defined by an alpha angle ≥60°. Linear regression models with generalized estimating equations were used to examine the relationship between group (symptomatic and asymptomatic) and each ROM measure. Interaction terms (group × cam morphology or group × sex) were included to examine if relationships between group and hip ROM were influenced by cam morphology or sex. Where appropriate, models were adjusted for sex, age, and cam morphology.

RESULTS

An interaction between the relationship between group × cam and internal rotation ROM was found. Symptomatic players with cam morphology had lower internal rotation ROM than controls with cam morphology (adjusted mean difference [AMD] = -4.5°; 95% CI, -7.4° to -1.6°). Hip/groin pain was not associated with internal rotation ROM if cam morphology was absent. A significant interaction was also found for group × sex and BKFO and total rotation ROM. Symptomatic women had lower total rotation ROM than control women (AMD = -8.2°; 95% CI, -14.1° to -2.2°), but no difference was seen in men. BKFO range was lower in men with hip/groin pain compared with control men (AMD = 1.6 cm; 95% CI, 0.3-3.0 cm), but no difference was seen in women. Flexion and external rotation ROM did not differ between symptomatic and control hips.

CONCLUSION

Cam morphology was an effect modifier of the relationship between hip/groin pain and internal rotation ROM. Sex-related differences were also observed in the relationship between hip/groin pain and hip ROM.