Evaluation of complications and biochemical recurrence rates after (super) extended lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of extended (e-PLND) and super-extended pelvic lymph node dissection (se-PLND) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) by examining lymph node (LN) yield, complications, LN metastasis, and biochemical recurrence (BCR) incidence.

METHODS

Between January 2016 and January 2020, 354 consecutive patients with > 5% risk of lymph node involvement (LNI), as predicted by the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nomogram, underwent RARP with (s)e-PLND at a high-volume center. The e-PLND involved removing fibrofatty lymphatic tissue around the obturator fossa, internal iliac region, and external iliac vessels. The se-PLND, performed at the discretion of the surgeons, also included lymph nodes from the pre-sacral and common iliac regions. Outcomes included histopathological findings by anatomical region; complications; and BCR incidence during follow-up.

RESULTS

The median LNI risk was 18% (IQR 9-31%). A median of 22 LN (IQR 16-28) were removed, with se-PLND yielding a higher number: 25 (IQR 20-32) compared to e-PLND: 17 (IQR 13-24) (p < 0.001). pN1 disease was detected in 22% of patients overall, higher in se-PLND (29%) than e-PLND (14%) (p < 0.001). Of metastatic LNs, 14% were situated outside the e-PLND template. Operation time was longer for se-PLND, but perioperative complications were similar between both groups. After a median follow-up of 24 months (IQR 7-33), BCR incidence was comparable between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Compared to standard extended pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND), super extended PLND increases lymph node yield and removal of metastatic deposits but does not contribute to progression free survival at mid-term.