European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology · 2016
Effects of ovarian ablation or suppression in premenopausal breast cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМетаанализОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhang P, Li C-Z, Jiao G-M, Zhang J-J, Zhao H-P, Yan F, Jia S-F, Hu B-S, Wu C-T
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The effect of ovarian ablation or suppression (OAS) in premenopausal women with breast cancer is controversial. The overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and adverse event of OAS versus no OAS were compared.
METHODS: A literature review of EMBASE, Web of Science, PUBMED, and Cochrane Library was conducted. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for OS and DFS, as well as risk ratio (RR) and 95% CI for adverse events were evaluated. I-squared statistic (I2) represents heterogeneity.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies with a total of 21,249 women were included. In premenopausal women aged 40 years or younger, there were significant differences in OS (HR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.66-0.94, P=0.008, I2 = 0%) and DFS (HR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.73-0.97, P=0.02, I2 = 0%) between OAS and no OAS. In advanced stage breast cancer, a significant difference was found in OS (HR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.60-0.96, P=0.02, I2 = 0%). Patients treated with OAS had more chances to have hot flushes (RR 1.91, 95% CI: 1.62-2.26, P < 0.01, I2 = 0%) and vaginal dryness (RR 1.19, 95% CI: 1.08-1.31, P=0.0003, I2 = 0%). No significant difference in depression (RR 1.28, 95% CI: 0.94-1.74, P=0.12, I2 = 0%).
CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that OAS plays a beneficial role in premenopausal women aged 40 years or younger and advanced stage breast cancer. However, OAS is associated with increase in hot flushes and vaginal dryness.
METHODS: A literature review of EMBASE, Web of Science, PUBMED, and Cochrane Library was conducted. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for OS and DFS, as well as risk ratio (RR) and 95% CI for adverse events were evaluated. I-squared statistic (I2) represents heterogeneity.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies with a total of 21,249 women were included. In premenopausal women aged 40 years or younger, there were significant differences in OS (HR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.66-0.94, P=0.008, I2 = 0%) and DFS (HR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.73-0.97, P=0.02, I2 = 0%) between OAS and no OAS. In advanced stage breast cancer, a significant difference was found in OS (HR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.60-0.96, P=0.02, I2 = 0%). Patients treated with OAS had more chances to have hot flushes (RR 1.91, 95% CI: 1.62-2.26, P < 0.01, I2 = 0%) and vaginal dryness (RR 1.19, 95% CI: 1.08-1.31, P=0.0003, I2 = 0%). No significant difference in depression (RR 1.28, 95% CI: 0.94-1.74, P=0.12, I2 = 0%).
CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that OAS plays a beneficial role in premenopausal women aged 40 years or younger and advanced stage breast cancer. However, OAS is associated with increase in hot flushes and vaginal dryness.