Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2001
"High-dose" UVA1 therapy of widespread plaque-type, nodular, and erythrodermic mycosis fungoides.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zane C, Leali C, Airò P, De Panfilis G, Pinton P C
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: UVA1 (340 to 400 nm) was found to be effective in the treatment of early-stage mycosis fungoides (MF).
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of UVA1 phototherapy for widespread plaque-type, nodular, and erythrodermic MF.
METHODS: Thirteen patients (8 with stage IB, 4 with IIB, and 1 with III MF) received 100 J/cm(2) UVA1 daily until remission. Four patients also had lesions inaccessible by UVA1 that were considered control lesions. Immunocytologic studies of skin infiltrates and circulating T cells were done before and after the therapy.
RESULTS: Eleven patients showed complete clinical and histologic responses. Two patients had a partial improvement. Unirradiated control lesions never improved. Serious short-term side effects were not recorded. Circulating CD4(+)/CD45RO(+) and CD4(+)/CD95(+) lymphocytes were significantly reduced by the therapy.
CONCLUSION: UVA1 therapy is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for advanced MF. The therapeutic relevance of the effects on circulating lymphocytes remains to be established because lesions in nonexposed cutaneous areas did not respond.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of UVA1 phototherapy for widespread plaque-type, nodular, and erythrodermic MF.
METHODS: Thirteen patients (8 with stage IB, 4 with IIB, and 1 with III MF) received 100 J/cm(2) UVA1 daily until remission. Four patients also had lesions inaccessible by UVA1 that were considered control lesions. Immunocytologic studies of skin infiltrates and circulating T cells were done before and after the therapy.
RESULTS: Eleven patients showed complete clinical and histologic responses. Two patients had a partial improvement. Unirradiated control lesions never improved. Serious short-term side effects were not recorded. Circulating CD4(+)/CD45RO(+) and CD4(+)/CD95(+) lymphocytes were significantly reduced by the therapy.
CONCLUSION: UVA1 therapy is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for advanced MF. The therapeutic relevance of the effects on circulating lymphocytes remains to be established because lesions in nonexposed cutaneous areas did not respond.