Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2022
Cost-Effectiveness of Extracorporeal Photopheresis for the Treatment of Patients With Erythrodermic (Stage T4, M0) Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma in the Australian Setting.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Peacock Adrian, Dehle Francis, Mesa Zapata Oscar Alejandro, Prince H Miles, Gennari Francesca, Taylor Colman
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) is a rare and incurable disease, and patients currently experience a lack of treatment options in Australia. This analysis evaluated the cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) compared with standard of care therapy for the treatment of patients with erythrodermic (stage T4, M0) CTCL, who are refractory to previous systemic treatment.
METHODS: A Markov model was developed from the perspective of the Australian government. Health states were treatment specific and transition probabilities were modeled from time-to-next-treatment data from a published Australian observational study of ECP and comparator treatments. Quality of life utility values were based on psoriasis as a proxy for CTCL, which was validated by consultation with local clinicians. The time horizon for the model was 5 years. The ECP treatment regimen was compared with a weighted treatment comparator based on results of a treatment survey and Australian prescribing data.
RESULTS: ECP as a second-line treatment option for CTCL was less costly and more effective than other treatment strategies. ECP had an average cost saving of $37 592 and incremental quality-adjusted life-year gained of 0.20 to 0.21, attributed to patients being able to better tolerate ECP thus avoiding subsequent treatment with high-cost alternatives.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first published cost-utility analysis of ECP for CTCL. This analysis demonstrates that ECP is a cost-effective option for the treatment of patients with erythrodermic CTCL in Australia.
METHODS: A Markov model was developed from the perspective of the Australian government. Health states were treatment specific and transition probabilities were modeled from time-to-next-treatment data from a published Australian observational study of ECP and comparator treatments. Quality of life utility values were based on psoriasis as a proxy for CTCL, which was validated by consultation with local clinicians. The time horizon for the model was 5 years. The ECP treatment regimen was compared with a weighted treatment comparator based on results of a treatment survey and Australian prescribing data.
RESULTS: ECP as a second-line treatment option for CTCL was less costly and more effective than other treatment strategies. ECP had an average cost saving of $37 592 and incremental quality-adjusted life-year gained of 0.20 to 0.21, attributed to patients being able to better tolerate ECP thus avoiding subsequent treatment with high-cost alternatives.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first published cost-utility analysis of ECP for CTCL. This analysis demonstrates that ECP is a cost-effective option for the treatment of patients with erythrodermic CTCL in Australia.