American journal of otolaryngology · 2021
Comparing tracheostomy techniques: Bjork flap vs. tracheal window.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kennedy Maeve M, Abdel-Aty Yassmeen, Lott David G
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Various operative techniques are used to perform tracheostomies. The objective of this study was to evaluate patient factors that influence the decision to perform a Bjork flap or a window.
METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of all patients who underwent tracheostomies from January 2015 to December 2019 at a tertiary care medical center. All patients underwent tracheostomy with either a Bjork flap or a window. Charts were reviewed for demographics, comorbidities, indication for tracheostomy, operative details, and complications.
RESULTS: A total of 217 tracheostomies were evaluated, of which 104 (47.9%) had a Bjork flap and 113 (52.1%) had a window. Bjork flap was significantly more likely to be performed in patients with a higher average body mass index (p = 0.05), requiring ventilatory support (p = 0.0001), or had a stroke (p = 0.0140). A window was used significantly more in patients with prior neck dissection (p = 0.0110) or neck radiation (p < 0.0001). No significant difference was observed for post-op bleeding, returning to the operating room, or days to decannulation. In all tracheostomies, thrombocytopenia was found to significantly correlate with post-op bleeding (p = 0.0006), while blood thinner use did not.
CONCLUSION: Bjork flaps were more likely to be performed in those with a history of prolonged mechanical ventilation and elevated body mass index. Windows were performed more frequently in patients with a head and neck cancer history. Future prospective studies are needed to compare the outcomes of these techniques and their impacts on the trachea long term.
METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of all patients who underwent tracheostomies from January 2015 to December 2019 at a tertiary care medical center. All patients underwent tracheostomy with either a Bjork flap or a window. Charts were reviewed for demographics, comorbidities, indication for tracheostomy, operative details, and complications.
RESULTS: A total of 217 tracheostomies were evaluated, of which 104 (47.9%) had a Bjork flap and 113 (52.1%) had a window. Bjork flap was significantly more likely to be performed in patients with a higher average body mass index (p = 0.05), requiring ventilatory support (p = 0.0001), or had a stroke (p = 0.0140). A window was used significantly more in patients with prior neck dissection (p = 0.0110) or neck radiation (p < 0.0001). No significant difference was observed for post-op bleeding, returning to the operating room, or days to decannulation. In all tracheostomies, thrombocytopenia was found to significantly correlate with post-op bleeding (p = 0.0006), while blood thinner use did not.
CONCLUSION: Bjork flaps were more likely to be performed in those with a history of prolonged mechanical ventilation and elevated body mass index. Windows were performed more frequently in patients with a head and neck cancer history. Future prospective studies are needed to compare the outcomes of these techniques and their impacts on the trachea long term.