Gynecologie, obstetrique & fertilite · 2012
[Surgical reduction of labia minora: which approach?].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pourcelot A-G, Fernandez H, Legendre G
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Surgical approaches for reduction of labia minora are various. Through a literature review we try to determine which method is the more efficient to treat hypertrophy of labia minora.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A review was made by using Medline from 1980 to 2012. The keywords used were "hypertrophy of labia minora" and "surgical reduction of labia minora".
RESULTS: No randomized trial was found. We found only two retrospective studies about triangular resection concerning large series of patients, with a long follow-up and precise assessment of women satisfaction.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Surgical approaches for hypertrophy of labia minora are various. Triangular resection is the only method which was studied for a large series of patients. Functional and aesthetic results are good (90 to 95% of cases) and complications are rare (2 to 7%). Results of other methods are similar. Consequently, the method must be adjusted to surgeon's experience, anatomic features and wish of the patient.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A review was made by using Medline from 1980 to 2012. The keywords used were "hypertrophy of labia minora" and "surgical reduction of labia minora".
RESULTS: No randomized trial was found. We found only two retrospective studies about triangular resection concerning large series of patients, with a long follow-up and precise assessment of women satisfaction.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Surgical approaches for hypertrophy of labia minora are various. Triangular resection is the only method which was studied for a large series of patients. Functional and aesthetic results are good (90 to 95% of cases) and complications are rare (2 to 7%). Results of other methods are similar. Consequently, the method must be adjusted to surgeon's experience, anatomic features and wish of the patient.