The British journal of radiology · 2019
Comparison of radiomics tools for image analyses and clinical prediction in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Liang Zhong-Guo, Tan Hong Qi, Zhang Fan, Rui Tan Lloyd Kuan, Lin Li, Lenkowicz Jacopo, Wang Haitao, Wen Ong Enya Hui, Kusumawidjaja Grace, Phua Jun Hao, Gan Soon Ann, Sin Sze Yarn, Ng Yan Yee, Tan Terence Wee, Soong Yoke Lim, Fong Kam Weng, Park Sung Yong, Soo Khee-Chee, Wee Joseph Tien, Zhu Xiao-Dong, Valentini Vincenzo, Boldrini Luca, Sun Ying, Chua Melvin Lee
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Radiomics pipelines have been developed to extract novel information from radiological images, which may help in phenotypic profiling of tumours that would correlate to prognosis. Here, we compared two publicly available pipelines for radiomics analyses on head and neck CT and MRI in nasopharynx cancer (NPC).
METHODS AND MATERIALS: 100 biopsy-proven NPC cases stratified by T- and N-categories were enrolled in this study. Two radiomics pipeline, Moddicom (v. 0.51) and Pyradiomics (v. 2.1.2) were used to extract radiomics features of CT and MRI. Segmentation of primary gross tumour volume was performed using Velocity v. 4.0 by consensus agreement between three radiation oncologists. Intraclass correlation between common features of the two pipelines was analysed by Spearman's rank correlation. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering was used to determine association between radiomics features and clinical parameters.
RESULTS: We observed a high proportion of correlated features in the CT data set, but not for MRI; 76.1% (51 of 67 common between Moddicom and Pyradiomics) of CT features and 28.6% (20 of 70 common) of MRI features were significantly correlated. Of these, 100% were shape-related for both CT and MRI, 100 and 23.5% were first-order-related, 61.9 and 19.0% were texture-related, respectively. This interpipeline heterogeneity affected the downstream clustering with known prognostic clinical parameters of cTN-status and GTVp. Nonetheless, shape features were the most reproducible predictors of clinical parameters among the different radiomics modules.
CONCLUSION: Here, we highlighted significant heterogeneity between two publicly available radiomics pipelines that could affect the downstream association with prognostic clinical factors in NPC.
ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The present study emphasized the broader importance of selecting stable radiomics features for disease phenotyping, and it is necessary prior to any investigation of multicentre imaging datasets to validate the stability of CT-related radiomics features for clinical prognostication.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: 100 biopsy-proven NPC cases stratified by T- and N-categories were enrolled in this study. Two radiomics pipeline, Moddicom (v. 0.51) and Pyradiomics (v. 2.1.2) were used to extract radiomics features of CT and MRI. Segmentation of primary gross tumour volume was performed using Velocity v. 4.0 by consensus agreement between three radiation oncologists. Intraclass correlation between common features of the two pipelines was analysed by Spearman's rank correlation. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering was used to determine association between radiomics features and clinical parameters.
RESULTS: We observed a high proportion of correlated features in the CT data set, but not for MRI; 76.1% (51 of 67 common between Moddicom and Pyradiomics) of CT features and 28.6% (20 of 70 common) of MRI features were significantly correlated. Of these, 100% were shape-related for both CT and MRI, 100 and 23.5% were first-order-related, 61.9 and 19.0% were texture-related, respectively. This interpipeline heterogeneity affected the downstream clustering with known prognostic clinical parameters of cTN-status and GTVp. Nonetheless, shape features were the most reproducible predictors of clinical parameters among the different radiomics modules.
CONCLUSION: Here, we highlighted significant heterogeneity between two publicly available radiomics pipelines that could affect the downstream association with prognostic clinical factors in NPC.
ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The present study emphasized the broader importance of selecting stable radiomics features for disease phenotyping, and it is necessary prior to any investigation of multicentre imaging datasets to validate the stability of CT-related radiomics features for clinical prognostication.