MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1017/s095026881300188x

Медицинская библиотека · Epidemiology and infection · 2013

Using public health scenarios to predict the utility of a national syndromic surveillance programme during the 2012 London Olympic and Paralympic Games.

Morbey R A, Elliot A J, Charlett A, Ibbotson S, Verlander N Q, Leach S, Hall I, Barrass I, Catchpole M, McCloskey B, Said B, Walsh A, Pebody R, Smith G E

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

During 2012 real-time syndromic surveillance formed a key part of the daily public health surveillance for the London Olympic and Paralympic Games. It was vital that these systems were evaluated prior to the Games; in particular what types and scales of incidents could and could not be detected. Different public health scenarios were created covering a range of potential incidents that the Health Protection Agency would require syndromic surveillance to rapidly detect and monitor. For the scenarios considered it is now possible to determine what is likely to be detectable and how incidents are likely to present using the different syndromic systems. Small localized incidents involving food poisoning are most likely to be detected the next day via emergency department surveillance, while a new strain of influenza is more likely to be detected via GP or telephone helpline surveillance, several weeks after the first seed case is introduced.

Для цитирования: Morbey R A, Elliot A J, Charlett A, Ibbotson S, Verlander N Q, Leach S, Hall I, Barrass I, Catchpole M, McCloskey B, Said B, Walsh A, Pebody R, Smith G E. Using public health scenarios to predict the utility of a national syndromic surveillance programme during the 2012 London Olympic and Paralympic Games.. Epidemiology and infection. 2013. DOI: 10.1017/s095026881300188x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.