American journal of ophthalmology · 2022
Rates of Choroidal and Neurodegenerative Changes Over Time in Diabetic Patients Without Retinopathy: A 3-Year Prospective Study.
Наблюдательное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Huang Yining, Zhang Nuan, Bulloch Gabriella, Zhang Shiran, Shang Xianwen, Chen Yifan, Liao Huan, Zhu Zhuoting, Wang Wei
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the longitudinal changes of retinal neurodegeneration and choroidal thickness in diabetic patients with and without diabetic retinopathy (DR).
DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study.
METHODS: This prospective observational cohort study recruited type 2 diabetic patients from a community registry in Guangzhou. All participants underwent annual ocular examinations via swept-source optical coherence tomography that obtained choroid thickness (CT), retinal thickness (RT), and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GC-IPL) thickness. The changes in GC-IPL, CT, and RT between patients who developed incident DR (IDR) or remained non-DR (NDR) were compared during a 3-year follow-up.
RESULTS: Among 924 patients, 159 (17.2%) patients developed IDR within the 3-year follow-up. A reduction in GC-IPL, RT, and CT was observed in NDR and IDR; however, CT thinning in patients with IDR was significantly accelerated, with an average CT reduction of -6.98 (95% CI: -8.26, -5.71) μm/y in patients with IDR and -3.98 (95% CI: -4.60, -3.36) μm/y in NDR patients (P < .001). Reductions in average GC-IPL thickness over 3 years were -0.97 (95% CI: -1.24, -0.70) μm/y in patients with IDR and -0.76 (95% CI: -0.82, -0.70) μm/y in NDR patients (P = .025). After adjusting for confounding factors, the average CT and GC-IPL thinning were significantly faster in patients with IDR compared with those who remained NDR by 2.09 μm/y (95% CI: 1.01, 3.16; P = .004) and -0.29 μm/y (95% CI: -0.49, -0.09; P = .004), respectively. The RT in the IDR group increased, whereas the RT in the NDR group decreased over time, with the adjusted difference of 2.09 μm/y (95% CI: 1.01, 3.16; P < .001) for central field RT.
CONCLUSIONS: The rate of retinal neurodegeneration and CT thinning were significantly different between the eyes that developed IDR and remained NDR during the 3-year follow-up, but both groups observed thickness reduction. This indicates that GC-IPL and CTs may decrease before the clinical manifestations of DR.
DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study.
METHODS: This prospective observational cohort study recruited type 2 diabetic patients from a community registry in Guangzhou. All participants underwent annual ocular examinations via swept-source optical coherence tomography that obtained choroid thickness (CT), retinal thickness (RT), and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GC-IPL) thickness. The changes in GC-IPL, CT, and RT between patients who developed incident DR (IDR) or remained non-DR (NDR) were compared during a 3-year follow-up.
RESULTS: Among 924 patients, 159 (17.2%) patients developed IDR within the 3-year follow-up. A reduction in GC-IPL, RT, and CT was observed in NDR and IDR; however, CT thinning in patients with IDR was significantly accelerated, with an average CT reduction of -6.98 (95% CI: -8.26, -5.71) μm/y in patients with IDR and -3.98 (95% CI: -4.60, -3.36) μm/y in NDR patients (P < .001). Reductions in average GC-IPL thickness over 3 years were -0.97 (95% CI: -1.24, -0.70) μm/y in patients with IDR and -0.76 (95% CI: -0.82, -0.70) μm/y in NDR patients (P = .025). After adjusting for confounding factors, the average CT and GC-IPL thinning were significantly faster in patients with IDR compared with those who remained NDR by 2.09 μm/y (95% CI: 1.01, 3.16; P = .004) and -0.29 μm/y (95% CI: -0.49, -0.09; P = .004), respectively. The RT in the IDR group increased, whereas the RT in the NDR group decreased over time, with the adjusted difference of 2.09 μm/y (95% CI: 1.01, 3.16; P < .001) for central field RT.
CONCLUSIONS: The rate of retinal neurodegeneration and CT thinning were significantly different between the eyes that developed IDR and remained NDR during the 3-year follow-up, but both groups observed thickness reduction. This indicates that GC-IPL and CTs may decrease before the clinical manifestations of DR.