Cell reports. Medicine · 2023
Small intestine vs. colon ecology and physiology: Why it matters in probiotic administration.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jensen Benjamin Anderschou Holbech, Heyndrickx Marc, Jonkers Daisy, Mackie Alan, Millet Sam, Naghibi Malwina, Pærregaard Simone Isling, Pot Bruno, Saulnier Delphine, Sina Christian, Sterkman Luc Gerardus Willibrordus, Van den Abbeele Pieter, Venlet Naomi Vita, Zoetendal Erwin G, Ouwehand Arthur Constantijn
Аннотация
Research on gut microbiota has generally focused on fecal samples, representing luminal content of the large intestine. However, nutrient uptake is restricted to the small intestine. Abundant immune cell populations at this anatomical site combined with diminished mucus secretion and looser junctions (partly to allow for more efficient fluid and nutrient absorption) also results in intimate host-microbe interactions despite more rapid transit. It is thus crucial to dissect key differences in both ecology and physiology between small and large intestine to better leverage the immense potential of human gut microbiota imprinting, including probiotic engraftment at biological sensible niches. Here, we provide a detailed review unfolding how the physiological and anatomical differences between the small and large intestine affect gut microbiota composition, function, and plasticity. This information is key to understanding how gut microbiota manipulation, including probiotic administration, may strain-dependently transform host-microbe interactions at defined locations.