Kidney360 · 2026
Comparison of eGFR based on Serum Cystatin C or Creatinine in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Roth John, Vaughan Lisa, Ghanem Ahmad, Debeh Fadi George Munairdjy, Kennedy Austin, Gregory Adriana V, Kline Timothy L, Chebib Fouad T, Zoghby Ziad, Titan Silvia M, Dahl Neera K
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Total kidney volume (TKV), a prognostic biomarker in ADPKD, is used to stratify high risk individuals. eGFR measures may carry significant error in ADPKD compared to measured GFR(mGFR). This retrospective study investigates the association between height adjusted TKV (htTKV) and eGFR derived from race-free CKD-EPI equations utilizing creatinine and cystatin C.
METHODS: eGFR was calculated using 3 race-free CKD-EPI formulas: creatinine-based (CKD-EPI creatinine), cystatin C (CKD-EPI cys), and creatinine-cystatin C (CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin C) equations on 697 Mayo Clinic ADPKD patients. Correlations between eGFR and TKV measures were estimated and stratified by MIC class risk groups and CKD. Linear regression models were computed to predict ln(htTKV) from the 3 eGFR data sets. The eGFR measures were compared to iothalamate-based mGFR in a subset of patients (n=50).
RESULTS: A correlation between eGFR measures and htTKV (Pearson correlation r of -0.53 to -0.54), varied by MIC stratification. Pearson correlation was -0.47 to -0.48 for MIC 1A and 1B, -0.67 to -0.71 for MIC 1C, and -0.67 to -0.68 for MIC 1D and 1E. All equations were significantly associated with htTKV levels, with similar adjusted beta values (95% CI) of -0.15 (-0.17 to -0.13), -0.14 (-0.16 to -0.12), -0.15 (-0.16 to -0.13), for CKD-EPI creatinine, CKD-EPI cystatin C, and CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin C, respectively. Compared to mGFR, the CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin C equation was the least biased (mean -0.86 (95% CI: -3.09 to 1.37)) versus CKD-EPI creatinine (2.31 (-0.73 to 5.34)) or CKD-EPI cystatin C (-3.54 (-5.86 to -1.21)), and most precise, with 1-P30 of 16% (95% CI 7.2% to 29.1%), compared to 18% (8.6% to 31.4%) for CKD-EPI creatinine, or 20% (10.0% to 33.7%) for CKD-EPI cystatin C.
CONCLUSION: A moderate correlation between eGFR and htTKV associated with MIC stratification. Associations between htTKV and all 3 CKD-EPI equations were similar. CKDEPIcrcys tended to be the least biased and most precise equation when compared to mGFR and may be a reasonable alternative.
METHODS: eGFR was calculated using 3 race-free CKD-EPI formulas: creatinine-based (CKD-EPI creatinine), cystatin C (CKD-EPI cys), and creatinine-cystatin C (CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin C) equations on 697 Mayo Clinic ADPKD patients. Correlations between eGFR and TKV measures were estimated and stratified by MIC class risk groups and CKD. Linear regression models were computed to predict ln(htTKV) from the 3 eGFR data sets. The eGFR measures were compared to iothalamate-based mGFR in a subset of patients (n=50).
RESULTS: A correlation between eGFR measures and htTKV (Pearson correlation r of -0.53 to -0.54), varied by MIC stratification. Pearson correlation was -0.47 to -0.48 for MIC 1A and 1B, -0.67 to -0.71 for MIC 1C, and -0.67 to -0.68 for MIC 1D and 1E. All equations were significantly associated with htTKV levels, with similar adjusted beta values (95% CI) of -0.15 (-0.17 to -0.13), -0.14 (-0.16 to -0.12), -0.15 (-0.16 to -0.13), for CKD-EPI creatinine, CKD-EPI cystatin C, and CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin C, respectively. Compared to mGFR, the CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin C equation was the least biased (mean -0.86 (95% CI: -3.09 to 1.37)) versus CKD-EPI creatinine (2.31 (-0.73 to 5.34)) or CKD-EPI cystatin C (-3.54 (-5.86 to -1.21)), and most precise, with 1-P30 of 16% (95% CI 7.2% to 29.1%), compared to 18% (8.6% to 31.4%) for CKD-EPI creatinine, or 20% (10.0% to 33.7%) for CKD-EPI cystatin C.
CONCLUSION: A moderate correlation between eGFR and htTKV associated with MIC stratification. Associations between htTKV and all 3 CKD-EPI equations were similar. CKDEPIcrcys tended to be the least biased and most precise equation when compared to mGFR and may be a reasonable alternative.