BJUI compass · 2026
Outcomes of Aquablation in BPH with bladder stones: Analysis of the ICARUS database.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cabral Joshua D, Gannon Margaret, Raster Gregory, Nusbaum David J, Bouhadana David, Arezki Adel, Hamouda Aalya, Leathead Anouk, Ohana Ilan, Foucault Rosie, Sadri Iman, Sioufi Jeffrey A, Lee Nick, Benzouak Tarek, Murad Liam, Corsi Nicholas J, Klein John, Singh Inderjit, Kearns James, Chang Cecilia, Justo Quintas Juan, Zorn Kevin C, Rodrigues Tiago, Marhamati Shawn H, Helfand Brian T, Glaser Alexander P
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is investigate the clinical outcomes of men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and bladder stones treated concomitantly with Aquablation and bladder stone removal in an international, multi-institutional cohort.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of men who underwent Aquablation between 2018 and 2024. Patients were divided into two cohorts: men with bladder stones and those without. Outcomes assessed included baseline demographics and variables (medication use, prostate volume, prior BPH surgery), operative characteristics (OR time, transfusion requirement, complications), and functional outcomes were measured by the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), peak urinary flow rate (Q max) and PVR at regular intervals over 24 months.
RESULTS: A total of 1885 men were analysed, including 60 men with bladder stones and 1825 without. Patients with bladder stones had higher rates of prior BPH surgery (15% vs. 5.5%, p = 0.015) and pre-operative urinary retention (28.3% vs. 14.8%, p = 0.004) as well as larger prostate volumes (98.6 ml vs. 77 ml, p < 0.0001). Total operative time was longer in the bladder stone group (76.5 mins vs. 55.0 mins, p < 0.001), but there were no significant differences in Aquablation time or bleeding complications including transfusions. There was also no difference in improvements in IPSS, Q max and PVR post-operatively.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that Aquablation is safe and effective in the management of BPH regardless of concomitant bladder stone treatment.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of men who underwent Aquablation between 2018 and 2024. Patients were divided into two cohorts: men with bladder stones and those without. Outcomes assessed included baseline demographics and variables (medication use, prostate volume, prior BPH surgery), operative characteristics (OR time, transfusion requirement, complications), and functional outcomes were measured by the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), peak urinary flow rate (Q max) and PVR at regular intervals over 24 months.
RESULTS: A total of 1885 men were analysed, including 60 men with bladder stones and 1825 without. Patients with bladder stones had higher rates of prior BPH surgery (15% vs. 5.5%, p = 0.015) and pre-operative urinary retention (28.3% vs. 14.8%, p = 0.004) as well as larger prostate volumes (98.6 ml vs. 77 ml, p < 0.0001). Total operative time was longer in the bladder stone group (76.5 mins vs. 55.0 mins, p < 0.001), but there were no significant differences in Aquablation time or bleeding complications including transfusions. There was also no difference in improvements in IPSS, Q max and PVR post-operatively.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that Aquablation is safe and effective in the management of BPH regardless of concomitant bladder stone treatment.