Long-Term Outcomes of the Self-Expandable Metallic Stent as a Bridge to Surgery versus Elective Surgery without Stent Placement for Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND

The uncertainty surrounding whether delaying surgery after self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) placement for neoplastic stricture can yield similar oncologic outcomes as elective surgery remains. This study aims to investigate the impact of elective surgery following SEMS placement for obstructive colorectal cancer (OCC) on patients.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with stage I to III colorectal cancer (CRC) were recruited and randomly allocated into two groups: group A, receiving elective surgery after SEMS placement for obstructive colon cancer, and group B, undergoing elective surgery for non-obstructive colorectal cancer. Following a 1:2 matching process based on age, gender, tumor location, tumor depth, pathological stage, and adjuvant chemotherapy, group A comprised 95 patients, while group B consisted of 190 patients for comparative analysis.

RESULTS

The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate and overall survival (OS) rate were worse in group A (62.3% vs. 70.9%, p = 0.086) and (65.6% vs. 75.8%, p = 0.093) compared with group B, although these differences were not statistically significant. This discrepancy in long-term oncologic outcomes did not reach significance when the analysis was stratified by tumor perineural invasion (PNI) status. Univariate analysis revealed that SEMS placement was not a poor prognostic factor for DFS (p = 0.086).

CONCLUSIONS

Elective surgery for obstructive colorectal cancer (OCC) following SEMS placement may exhibit poorer long-term oncologic outcomes compared to elective surgery for non-obstructive colorectal cancer, particularly due to the higher rate of PNI associated with OCC. Upon stratification of patients in each group by PNI status, the observed differences became marginal.