Thoracic cancer · 2024
Women patients with small-cell lung cancer using immunotherapy in a real-world cohort achieved long-term survival.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
He Yuling, Kong Lingdong, Ji Xumeng, Zhuo Minglei, An Tongtong, Jia Bo, Chi Yujia, Wang Jingjing, Zhao Jun, Li Jianjie, Yang Xue, Chen Hanxiao, Zhai Xiaoyu, Tai Yidi, Ding Lu, Wang Ziping, Wang Yuyan
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Usage of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has prolonged the overall survival (OS) of patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). In clinical trials, males accounted for a large proportion, leading to the uncertainty of its efficacy in female patients. We therefore conducted this study to explore the efficacy and safety of using ICIs in female patients with ES-SCLC.
METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled female SCLC patients and subdivided them into two groups. Group A (n = 40) was defined as ES-SCLC patients who received first-line standard chemotherapy with or without ICIs. Group B (n = 47) included relapsed SCLC patients who were administered with second-line therapies. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to calculate survival analysis. Chi-squared tests were used to analyze the incidence of adverse events (AEs).
RESULTS: Median progression-free survival (PFS) and median OS favored the ICI-contained cohorts (Group A PFS: 8.3 vs. 6.1 months; OS: not reached vs. 11.3 months; Group B PFS: 15.1 vs. 3.3 months; OS: 35.3 vs. 8.3 months), especially in those patients who received second-line immunotherapies. Patients who received immunotherapy had a slightly higher incidence rate of grade ≥3 AEs (Group A: 71.4% vs. 46.2%; Group B: 44.5% vs. 13.2%). Those who developed grade ≥3 AEs in first-line ICIs cohort had a more favorable survival (PFS: 8.3 vs. 3.2 months; OS: not reached vs. 5.1 months).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggested that female ES-SCLC patients treated with immunotherapy tended to achieve a relatively longer survival. The incidence of AEs (grade ≥3) was higher in women patients receiving ICIs, which requires monitoring more closely.
METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled female SCLC patients and subdivided them into two groups. Group A (n = 40) was defined as ES-SCLC patients who received first-line standard chemotherapy with or without ICIs. Group B (n = 47) included relapsed SCLC patients who were administered with second-line therapies. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to calculate survival analysis. Chi-squared tests were used to analyze the incidence of adverse events (AEs).
RESULTS: Median progression-free survival (PFS) and median OS favored the ICI-contained cohorts (Group A PFS: 8.3 vs. 6.1 months; OS: not reached vs. 11.3 months; Group B PFS: 15.1 vs. 3.3 months; OS: 35.3 vs. 8.3 months), especially in those patients who received second-line immunotherapies. Patients who received immunotherapy had a slightly higher incidence rate of grade ≥3 AEs (Group A: 71.4% vs. 46.2%; Group B: 44.5% vs. 13.2%). Those who developed grade ≥3 AEs in first-line ICIs cohort had a more favorable survival (PFS: 8.3 vs. 3.2 months; OS: not reached vs. 5.1 months).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggested that female ES-SCLC patients treated with immunotherapy tended to achieve a relatively longer survival. The incidence of AEs (grade ≥3) was higher in women patients receiving ICIs, which requires monitoring more closely.