MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Journal de radiologie · 2002

[Prevalence and morphology of pineal cysts discovered at pituitary MRI: review of 1844 examinations].

Petitcolin V, Garcier J M, Mohammedi R, Ravel A, Mofid R, Viallet J F, Vanneuville G, Boyer L

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To evaluate the frequency, morphology and clinical long term evolution of pineal cysts depicted on MRI.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

one thousand eight hundred and forty four (1 532 women and 126 men) MRI examinations were retrospectively reviewed. Coronal and sagittal spin echo T1 weighted sequences without and with gadolinium injection were performed, completed with spin echo T2 weighted images when a cystic sellar lesion was suspected. A pineal cyst was diagnosed as a rounded well defined lesion, with fluid signal in an enlarged pineal gland. Follow-up examinations were performed to evaluate the efficacy of the treatment of the sellar lesion.

RESULTS

Twenty one epiphyseal cysts (1.27%) were diagnosed in 20 women (1.31%) and one man (0.79%). Their size was 1,2 +/- 0,4 cm (0,3 to 2 cm). They were asymptomatic. In 10 patients, follow-up MRI examinations did not show any change in size. During the clinical follow-up, these twenty-one patients remained asymptomatic (6 months to 5 years).

CONCLUSION

The incidental detection of a pineal cyst at MRI is not exceptional. This lesion's pattern appears characteristic and their reputation of benignity is confirmed in our study.

Для цитирования: Petitcolin V, Garcier J M, Mohammedi R, Ravel A, Mofid R, Viallet J F, Vanneuville G, Boyer L. [Prevalence and morphology of pineal cysts discovered at pituitary MRI: review of 1844 examinations].. Journal de radiologie. 2002.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.