Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
Assessing the significance of CCNE1 overexpression in triple negative breast cancer.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Makas Nigar Pelin, Belder Nevin, Akbulut-Çalışkan Özge, Saatçi Özge, Ersan Pelin Gülizar, Şahin Özgür, Alanyalı Filiz Susuz
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Cyclin E1 (CCNE1), a critical regulator of cell cycle progression, has been implicated in various cancers; however, its prognostic significance and functional role across breast cancer (BC) subtypes remain inadequately defined. This study aims to comprehensively analyze CCNE1 mRNA expression and evaluate its potential as both a prognostic biomarker and a therapeutic guide.
METHODS: We analyzed CCNE1 mRNA expression using large-scale BC cohorts (TCGA, METABRIC, GEO) and assessed associations with tumour grade, overall survival, and mutation status. The muTarget platform was employed to investigate associations between CCNE1 expression and key genetic alterations. Furthermore, gene set enrichment analysis was performed to identify enriched biological pathways, and functional studies were conducted using mTORC1 inhibition in TP53-mutant, RB1-deficient TNBC cells to evaluate cell viability and CCNE1 expression levels.
RESULTS: CCNE1 expression was significantly associated with higher tumour grade, overall survival, and distinct mutation statuses. Gene set enrichment analysis revealed enrichment of proliferation-related pathways, including G2-M checkpoint, E2F targets, and mTORC1 signaling in CCNE1-high tumors. Moreover, functional studies showed that mTORC1 inhibition successfully reduced CCNE1 expression and impaired viability in TP53-mutant, RB1-deficient TNBC cells.
CONCLUSIONS: CCNE1 overexpression characterises a clinically aggressive subset of breast cancers, particularly TNBC. Targeting mTORC1 may represent a promising therapeutic approach in CCNE1-high, TP53-mutated, and RB1-deficient tumours, supporting the clinical utility of CCNE1 in patient stratification and targeted therapy.
METHODS: We analyzed CCNE1 mRNA expression using large-scale BC cohorts (TCGA, METABRIC, GEO) and assessed associations with tumour grade, overall survival, and mutation status. The muTarget platform was employed to investigate associations between CCNE1 expression and key genetic alterations. Furthermore, gene set enrichment analysis was performed to identify enriched biological pathways, and functional studies were conducted using mTORC1 inhibition in TP53-mutant, RB1-deficient TNBC cells to evaluate cell viability and CCNE1 expression levels.
RESULTS: CCNE1 expression was significantly associated with higher tumour grade, overall survival, and distinct mutation statuses. Gene set enrichment analysis revealed enrichment of proliferation-related pathways, including G2-M checkpoint, E2F targets, and mTORC1 signaling in CCNE1-high tumors. Moreover, functional studies showed that mTORC1 inhibition successfully reduced CCNE1 expression and impaired viability in TP53-mutant, RB1-deficient TNBC cells.
CONCLUSIONS: CCNE1 overexpression characterises a clinically aggressive subset of breast cancers, particularly TNBC. Targeting mTORC1 may represent a promising therapeutic approach in CCNE1-high, TP53-mutated, and RB1-deficient tumours, supporting the clinical utility of CCNE1 in patient stratification and targeted therapy.