The validity of a therapeutic invigoration task in avolitional schizophrenia outpatients.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVES
Avolition is associated with much morbidity and functional impairment in schizophrenia patients. Vigor may be taken as, in part, the inverse of avolition, but it has not been investigated as a therapeutic pursuit before. To this end, a therapeutic invigoration task was developed drawing on cognitive-behavioral and guided imagery therapies. This study investigated the validity and reliability of a therapeutic invigoration task in avolitional residual phase schizophrenia outpatients.
METHODS
In a proof-of-concept quasi-experimental one-group sequentially repeated pretest/posttest study design, patients (n = 76) participated in a structured invigoration task that was repeated after 1 month (n = 70).
RESULTS
Patients' vigor during the preceding 7 days measured on the Vigor Assessment Scale increased highly significantly in anticipation of the subsequent 7 days on both occasions with respectively very large (Cohen's δ with Hedges' correction [δ] = 1.46) and large (δ = 1.04) effect sizes. The anticipated vigor after the first occasion was partially consummated during the subsequent month in that vigor during the 7 days preceding the second occasion was lower than participants had anticipated but still significantly higher than at baseline (p < 0.001; δ = 0.70). Repeating the task a month later, together with homework, had a cumulative effect as indicated by a very large effect size (δ = 1.61).
CONCLUSION
Results suggest that the invigoration task did what it was supposed do, and did so consistently, in patients with avolitional residual schizophrenia. These results warrant a subsequent randomized controlled trial to establish the efficacy of the invigoration task.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.