Prognosis After Sublobar Resection of Small-sized Non-small Cell Lung Cancer with Visceral Pleural or Lymphovascular Invasion.

BACKGROUND: Although standard surgical treatment of stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is lobectomy, sublobar resection may be elected for small-sized (≤2 cm) peripheral tumors. Our aim was examine the need for completion lobectomy in the event of confirmed pleural or lymphovascular invasion after sublobar resection of NSCLC.

METHODS: A total of 271 consecutive patients undergoing curative resection of stage I NSCLC ≤2 cm were reviewed retrospectively, analyzing clinicopathologic findings and survival times of those with invasion-positive (visceral pleural or lymphovascular invasion) or invasion-negative (neither visceral pleural nor lymphovascular invasion) tumors by surgical approach (sublobar resection vs lobectomy).

RESULTS: Aside from age and pulmonary function, clinicopathologic characteristics of the patient subsets did not differ significantly, nor did 5-year recurrence-free survival rates of surgical subsets (sublobar resection vs lobectomy) in respective tumor groups (invasion-positive 78.9 vs 79.8%, p = 0.928; invasion-negative 80.2 vs 85.4%, p = 0.505). In multivariate analysis, dissected lymph node count was the sole parameter significantly impacting recurrence of stage I invasion-positive NSCLC (hazard ratio = 0.914, 95% confidence interval 0.845-0.988; p = 0.023). Sublobar resection was not a risk factor for recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS: Survival rates for patients with small-sized (≤2 cm) NSCLC and visceral pleural or lymphovascular invasion did not differ significantly, whether sublobar resection or lobectomy was done. Hence, completion lobectomy is unnecessary in this setting.