m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
In vivo (Athens, Greece) · 2017

Rebiopsy of Histological Samples in Pretreated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Comparison Among Rebiopsy Procedures.

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Hata Akito, Katakami Nobuyuki, Nanjo Shigeki, Okuda Chiyuki, Kaji Reiko, Imai Yukihiro

Аннотация

AIM: The aim of the present study was to compare successful rate, failure reasons, and complications among procedures of histological rebiopsy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of histologically rebiopsied cases with non-small cell lung cancer.

RESULTS: One hundred and eleven histological rebiopsies were performed in: 86 (77%) lung; 11 (10%) lymph node; 5 (5%) pleura; 4 (4%) liver; 2 (2%) muscle; 2 (2%) adrenal gland; and 1 (1%) rib. Successful rate by computed tomography-guided biopsy (CTGB), transbronchial biopsy (TBB), and ultrasound-guided biopsy were 86% (48/56), 90% (28/31), and 100% (24/24), respectively. Reasons for rebiopsy failure by CTGB were no/insufficient malignant cells (n=5) and pneumothorax (n=3), and those by TBB were no/insufficient malignant cells (n=2) and bleeding (n=1). Severe complications (≥grade 3): one grade 3 pneumothorax and one grade 4 air embolization were observed in two (2%, 2/111) cases receiving CTGB.

CONCLUSION: Rebiopsy of histological samples can be highly successful and feasible by optimal procedural selection.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты