"Vagina" Is Not a Bad Word: Historical and Contemporary Censorship of the Word "Vagina".

OBJECTIVE

To characterize instances of censorship of the word "vagina" to better understand perceptions and behaviors surrounding the word.

METHODS

Internet and relevant database (PubMed, Academic OneFile, Proquest, Health Business Elite, etc) searches were conducted for the words "vagina," "censor," and related wildcard terms. Search results were filtered by three independent reviewers for relevance. Related articles were summarized and reviewed for common themes. In addition, interviews were conducted with three people who have personal experience with censorship of the word "vagina." Interviews were transcribed and also reviewed for common themes.

RESULTS

Examples of censorship of the word "vagina" were compiled, and several themes were identified: (1) Policies surrounding censorship are unclear; (2) Policies appear highly variable; (3) There are differing standards between references to male and female genitalia; and (4) Objections often call the use of "vagina" overtly sexual, profane, or unprofessional.

CONCLUSION

The word "vagina" is censored across multiple platforms and policies regarding censorship are inconsistent and unclear. Pervasive censorship of the word "vagina" perpetuates a culture of ignorance and shame about women's bodies. Until we normalize the word "vagina," we cannot make progress on women's pelvic health.