Journal of clinical gastroenterology · 2026
Patient-reported Symptoms Are Independent of Extent of Disease in Longstanding Ulcerative Colitis: Magic in Imagine.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bernstein Charles N, Nugent Zoann, Panaccione Remo, Marshall Deborah A, Kaplan Gilaad G, Vanner Stephen, Dieleman Levinus A, Graff Lesley A, Otley Anthony, Jones Jennifer, Buresi Michelle, Murthy Sanjay, Borgaonkar Mark, Bressler Brian, Bitton Alain, Croitoru Kenneth, Sidani Sacha, Fernandes Aida, Moayyedi Paul
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The Inflammation, Microbiome, and Alimentation: Gastro-Intestinal and Neuropsychiatric Effects Strategy for Patient Oriented Research Network (IMAGINE) has conducted a 5-year multicenter prospective observational cohort study, Mind And Gut Interactions Cohort (MAGIC) in 14 centers across Canada from 2018 to 2022. Herein, we investigated the relationship between ulcerative colitis (UC) phenotypes, demographics and other relevant outcomes, and symptom reporting.
METHODS: At baseline, participants answered surveys assessing disease activity, medications and complementary therapies, lifestyle factors, psychological status, and comorbidities. UC phenotypes were classified by the Montreal Classification. Herein, we describe the association between phenotypes and demographics, medications used, comorbidities, and symptoms experienced in adults with UC. The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Symptom Inventory (IBDSI) was used to assess symptoms.
RESULTS: The maximal extent phenotypic distribution based on chart review was E1 (proctitis) n=261 (14.5%), E2 (left-sided colitis) n=671 (37.2%), and E3 (subtotal or pancolitis) n=794 (44.0%). More males had E3. Different phenotypes did not lead to differences in the use of complementary therapies. There was greater likelihood of primary sclerosing cholangitis but a lower likelihood of hypertension in E3. Among the 25 different symptoms queried in the IBDSI, there was no difference across phenotypes, except among persons with overall active IBDSI, there was more waking for urges for bowel movements in persons with E3.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, there was no difference in symptom reporting based on extent of UC except for cohort with overall active IBDSI there were some differences in nocturnal waking based on disease extent.
METHODS: At baseline, participants answered surveys assessing disease activity, medications and complementary therapies, lifestyle factors, psychological status, and comorbidities. UC phenotypes were classified by the Montreal Classification. Herein, we describe the association between phenotypes and demographics, medications used, comorbidities, and symptoms experienced in adults with UC. The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Symptom Inventory (IBDSI) was used to assess symptoms.
RESULTS: The maximal extent phenotypic distribution based on chart review was E1 (proctitis) n=261 (14.5%), E2 (left-sided colitis) n=671 (37.2%), and E3 (subtotal or pancolitis) n=794 (44.0%). More males had E3. Different phenotypes did not lead to differences in the use of complementary therapies. There was greater likelihood of primary sclerosing cholangitis but a lower likelihood of hypertension in E3. Among the 25 different symptoms queried in the IBDSI, there was no difference across phenotypes, except among persons with overall active IBDSI, there was more waking for urges for bowel movements in persons with E3.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, there was no difference in symptom reporting based on extent of UC except for cohort with overall active IBDSI there were some differences in nocturnal waking based on disease extent.