Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2013
Feasibility and impact on surgical outcomes of modified double-stapling technique for patients undergoing laparoscopic anterior resection.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kang Jeonghyun, Lee Han Beom, Cha Jang Ho, Hur Hyuk, Min Byung Soh, Baik Seung Hyuk, Kim Nam Kyu, Sohn Seung Kook, Lee Kang Young
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage is a major cause of postoperative morbidity and mortality in the treatment of colorectal cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the modified double-stapling technique (MDST), as an alternative for conventional double-stapling technique (DST), and whether it could reduce the anastomotic leakage rate in laparoscopic anterior resection (Lapa-AR).
STUDY DESIGN: Between March 2009 and October 2010, a total of 189 patients who underwent Lapa-AR for the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the sigmoid colon or rectosigmoid colon were divided into the MDST group (n = 95) and the DST group (n = 94) according to the anastomotic technique. Data were analyzed retrospectively. Morbidity and anastomotic leakage rate were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: Patient demographics, preoperative comorbidity, tumor size, stage, and operative details were comparable between the two groups. There was no difference in operation time between the two groups. The overall complication rate was significantly lower in the MDST group than in the DST group (3.2 vs. 10.6 %, p = 0.042), including anastomotic leakage rate (0 vs.4.6 %, p = 0.029). The anastomotic technique was the only factor associated with anastomotic leakage in univariate analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Our comparative study demonstrates MDST to have better short-term outcome in reducing anastomotic leakage compared with DST. This technique could be an alternative approach to maximize the patients' benefit in laparoscopic anterior resection.
STUDY DESIGN: Between March 2009 and October 2010, a total of 189 patients who underwent Lapa-AR for the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the sigmoid colon or rectosigmoid colon were divided into the MDST group (n = 95) and the DST group (n = 94) according to the anastomotic technique. Data were analyzed retrospectively. Morbidity and anastomotic leakage rate were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: Patient demographics, preoperative comorbidity, tumor size, stage, and operative details were comparable between the two groups. There was no difference in operation time between the two groups. The overall complication rate was significantly lower in the MDST group than in the DST group (3.2 vs. 10.6 %, p = 0.042), including anastomotic leakage rate (0 vs.4.6 %, p = 0.029). The anastomotic technique was the only factor associated with anastomotic leakage in univariate analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Our comparative study demonstrates MDST to have better short-term outcome in reducing anastomotic leakage compared with DST. This technique could be an alternative approach to maximize the patients' benefit in laparoscopic anterior resection.