MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Zhonghua wei chang wai ke za zhi = Chinese journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2011

[Value of radical dissection with vagus nerve preservation for proximal gastric cancer].

Sun Peng-da, Cao Hong, Zhu Jia-Ming, Fang Xue-Dong

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To study the feasibility and influence of vagus nerve preservation in radical operation for proximal gastric cancer.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients with early or T2 cardia cancer from May 2007 to May 2009 were enrolled and randomized into two groups, i.e. vagus nerve preservation group(n=16) and control group(n=16). Two groups were compared with regard to operative time, anastomotic fistula, digestive discomforts, body weight, survival rate, findings on gastroscope and abdominal ultrasonography.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in operative time (2.8 vs. 2.5 h), postoperative complications rate (25.0% vs. 31.3%). No recurrence or mortality was observed after one-year follow-up. However, patients who underwent vagus nerve preservation had less postprandial discomforts(3 vs. 12 cases), bile reflux(3 vs. 10 cases), atrophic gastritis(1 vs. 9 cases), gallstones(1 vs. 8 cases), body mass index, and diarrhea(P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

For patients with early gastric cancer, preservation of the vagus nerve during radical gastrectomy results in less complications and does not compromise patient survival.

Для цитирования: Sun Peng-da, Cao Hong, Zhu Jia-Ming, Fang Xue-Dong. [Value of radical dissection with vagus nerve preservation for proximal gastric cancer].. Zhonghua wei chang wai ke za zhi = Chinese journal of gastrointestinal surgery. 2011.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.