MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/rcs.2544

Медицинская библиотека · The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2023

Surgery of the alimentary tract for benign and malignant disease with the novel robotic platform HUGOTM RAS. A first world report of safety and feasibility.

Gangemi Antonio, Bernante Paolo, Rottoli Matteo, Pasquali Federica, Poggioli Gilberto

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

As robotic surgery increases its reach, novel platforms are being released. We present the first 17 consecutive cases of alimentary tract surgery performed with the HugoTM RAS (Medtronic).

METHODS

patients were selected to undergo surgery from February through April 2023. Exclusion criteria were age <16 years, BMI>60, ASA IV.

RESULTS

17 patients underwent ileocaecal resection for Chrons disease (2 M and 1 F) and pseudo-obstruction of the terminal ileum (1 M), cholecystectomy (3 M and 5 F), subtotal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy (1 F), sleeve gastrectomy (1 F), hiatal hernia repair with Nissen fundoplication (1 M), right hemicolectomy (1 M) and sigmoidectomy (1 M). No conversion to an open approach or any arm collisions requiring corrective actions were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary experience with the HugoTM RAS point to safety and feasibility for a rather wide spectrum of surgical procedures of the alimentary tract.

Для цитирования: Gangemi Antonio, Bernante Paolo, Rottoli Matteo, Pasquali Federica, Poggioli Gilberto. Surgery of the alimentary tract for benign and malignant disease with the novel robotic platform HUGOTM RAS. A first world report of safety and feasibility.. The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS. 2023. DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2544.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.