MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1099/00221287-130-6-1325

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of general microbiology · 1984

Ampicillin inactivation in the caecum of axenic, gnotoxenic and conventional lambs: interaction with resistant or sensitive Escherichia coli.

Coste M, Gouet P, Escoula L

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The fate of orally administered ampicillin was studied in axenic lambs, in gnotoxenic lambs given a complex microflora and a mixture of ampicillin resistant and/or sensitive strains of Escherichia coli, and in conventional lambs. In axenic lambs or animals with a sensitive microflora, antibiotic concentrations of 500-1600 micrograms ml-1 were detected in the intestine, and most of the ampicillin passed through the small intestine and entered the large intestine, within 12-15 h of administration. These antibiotic concentrations were sufficient to decrease the numbers of ampicillin-sensitive E. coli from 10(8)-10(9) bacteria ml-1 to about 10(5)-10(6) bacteria ml-1 by 8 h after ampicillin administration. Second and third doses of antibiotic had no further effect on the bacterial count. Administration of ampicillin to animals hosting ampicillin-resistant E. coli resulted in a significant inactivation of the antibiotic in the intestine. As might be expected there was little reduction in the numbers of these organisms. These results are similar to those observed in conventional lambs hosting resistant E. coli as the dominant colibacillary flora.

Для цитирования: Coste M, Gouet P, Escoula L. Ampicillin inactivation in the caecum of axenic, gnotoxenic and conventional lambs: interaction with resistant or sensitive Escherichia coli.. Journal of general microbiology. 1984. DOI: 10.1099/00221287-130-6-1325.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.