MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/hed.26323

Медицинская библиотека · Head & neck · 2020

Tympanum reconstruction using a sternocleidomastoid flap in patients with lateral skull base lesions: surgical technique and clinical report.

Feng Guodong, Wei Xingmei, Sun Huiying, Zhang Zhuhua, Tian Xu, Zhao Yang, Aodeng Surita, Zhou Yalin, Gao Zhiqiang

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

During surgical treatment of lesions involving the skull base, conductive hearing is often sacrificed due to tympanum destruction. This study aimed to develop a method for tympanum reconstruction using a sternocleidomastoid (SCM) flap to preserve conductive hearing during lateral skull base surgery.

METHODS

This study included five patients with lateral skull base lesions who underwent surgery including tympanum reconstruction with an SCM flap between July 2015 and November 2017.

RESULTS

Three patients seen with facial nerve schwannoma, and two had paraganglioma of the head and neck. All patients' inferior and posterior tympanic walls were resected; the tympanum and ossicular chain were reconstructed with an SCM flap and prosthesis. The mean postoperative air-bone gap was 14 dB. No lesion recurrences were observed until the last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The SCM flap is effective in preserving conductive hearing through reconstruction of the inferior and posterior tympanic walls in lateral skull base surgery.

Для цитирования: Feng Guodong, Wei Xingmei, Sun Huiying, Zhang Zhuhua, Tian Xu, Zhao Yang, Aodeng Surita, Zhou Yalin, Gao Zhiqiang. Tympanum reconstruction using a sternocleidomastoid flap in patients with lateral skull base lesions: surgical technique and clinical report.. Head & neck. 2020. DOI: 10.1002/hed.26323.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.