European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases · 2020
The medical uses of manosonic nebulizers (AMSA®) in 2018.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fieux M, Mélan J-B, Hermann R, Truy E, Tringali S
Аннотация
AIMS: The purpose of repeated application of manosonic nebulizers (AMSA®) is to ensure active Eustachian tube rehabilitation and optimal middle-ear drug diffusion. In response to recent changes in marketing authorizations issued by the French National Drug Safety Agency (ANSM), the present study investigated how AMSA® is used in the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes Region of France.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective non-interventional regional 1-year survey was conducted in 701 general practitioners and community and hospital ENT physicians in the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes Region, using a questionnaire sent by mail with a reminder at 2 months. Percentage responses were compared on Chi2 test with alpha risk of 5%. Non-respondents were excluded.
ENDPOINTS: The main endpoints were rate of AMSA® prescription, and prescription modalities in a specific geographical territory (Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes Region) in 2018.
RESULTS: 93% of the 114 respondents prescribed AMSA®, with 4,000 prescriptions in 1 year. 66.7% prescribed this treatment to avoid recourse to myringotomy. Mean treatment duration was 2 weeks (50.9% of respondents). The most frequent nebulized substance was saline serum (68.4% of respondents), sometimes associated to corticosteroids or mucolytics.
CONCLUSION: The majority of physicians in the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes Region, and notably the ENT physicians, were AMSA® prescribers for the treatment of Eustachian tube dysfunction and its consequences. However, the duration and modalities of use of AMSA® were very heterogeneous, and further studies are needed to standardize prescription.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective non-interventional regional 1-year survey was conducted in 701 general practitioners and community and hospital ENT physicians in the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes Region, using a questionnaire sent by mail with a reminder at 2 months. Percentage responses were compared on Chi2 test with alpha risk of 5%. Non-respondents were excluded.
ENDPOINTS: The main endpoints were rate of AMSA® prescription, and prescription modalities in a specific geographical territory (Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes Region) in 2018.
RESULTS: 93% of the 114 respondents prescribed AMSA®, with 4,000 prescriptions in 1 year. 66.7% prescribed this treatment to avoid recourse to myringotomy. Mean treatment duration was 2 weeks (50.9% of respondents). The most frequent nebulized substance was saline serum (68.4% of respondents), sometimes associated to corticosteroids or mucolytics.
CONCLUSION: The majority of physicians in the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes Region, and notably the ENT physicians, were AMSA® prescribers for the treatment of Eustachian tube dysfunction and its consequences. However, the duration and modalities of use of AMSA® were very heterogeneous, and further studies are needed to standardize prescription.