European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2020
Multi-operated cholesteatoma: when two surgeries are not enough.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hermann Ruben, Blanc Jacques, Fieux Maxime, Desternes Gauvain, Coudert Aurélie, Truy Eric
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Most studies regarding residual and recurrent cholesteatoma focus on single relapse. This study examines patients who had to undergo at least three surgeries for complete eradication of their cholesteatoma, with the aim of bringing to light risk factors and assessing the functional impact of multiple surgeries on hearing.
METHOD: We include 27 patients who underwent 3 consecutive surgeries for cholesteatoma between 2006 and 2016. This population represented 3.1% of all cholesteatoma operated on during that same period (868 patients).
RESULTS: Cases of multi-residual and/or recurrent cholesteatoma (RRC) were significantly younger (13.1 years old), than single-RRC or cases with No-RRC (respectively, 28.0 and 38.5 years old) (p < 0.01). Furthermore, there was a significant difference in cholesteatoma location especially for combined attical and mesotympanic location between the three groups (no-RCC 26%; single-RRC 34% and multi-RRC 66%) (p < 0.01). There was also a significant difference in ossicular erosion of the malleus, incus and stapes between the three groups (p < 0.01). In our study, the type of surgery did not influence multi-RRC rates. We did not observe any significant impact on hearing between the first and third surgeries. Mean duration between the first and second surgeries was significantly shorter for multi-RRC (14.5 months SD 8.3) than for single-RRC (23.3 months SD 18.1) (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Special care should be given in case of combined attical and mesotympanic extension, ossicular erosion and young children. Delaying the realization of MRI, and/or of second-look surgery, could decrease the risk of multi-RRC.
METHOD: We include 27 patients who underwent 3 consecutive surgeries for cholesteatoma between 2006 and 2016. This population represented 3.1% of all cholesteatoma operated on during that same period (868 patients).
RESULTS: Cases of multi-residual and/or recurrent cholesteatoma (RRC) were significantly younger (13.1 years old), than single-RRC or cases with No-RRC (respectively, 28.0 and 38.5 years old) (p < 0.01). Furthermore, there was a significant difference in cholesteatoma location especially for combined attical and mesotympanic location between the three groups (no-RCC 26%; single-RRC 34% and multi-RRC 66%) (p < 0.01). There was also a significant difference in ossicular erosion of the malleus, incus and stapes between the three groups (p < 0.01). In our study, the type of surgery did not influence multi-RRC rates. We did not observe any significant impact on hearing between the first and third surgeries. Mean duration between the first and second surgeries was significantly shorter for multi-RRC (14.5 months SD 8.3) than for single-RRC (23.3 months SD 18.1) (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Special care should be given in case of combined attical and mesotympanic extension, ossicular erosion and young children. Delaying the realization of MRI, and/or of second-look surgery, could decrease the risk of multi-RRC.